Power and performance comparision of body bias in 28HPC and back bias in 22FDX

K. Zhao, Jian Wang, Jianzhong Li, Bo Yang, Haihua Wang, Mingjie Shen, Fang Yu, Liewei Xu
{"title":"Power and performance comparision of body bias in 28HPC and back bias in 22FDX","authors":"K. Zhao, Jian Wang, Jianzhong Li, Bo Yang, Haihua Wang, Mingjie Shen, Fang Yu, Liewei Xu","doi":"10.1109/S3S.2017.8309225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the body bias in 28nm Bulk and the back bias in 22nm FDSOI are analyzed and compared from two aspects: power consumption and circuit performance. Taking a 65-stage ring oscillator (RO) with 4-level frequency divider as an example, transistor lengths are all set to 30nm, post simulation results show that, for 22FDX RO, the operating frequency can adjust from 57.8MHz to 206MHz, with the operating current varies from 24uA to 91uA; while for 28HPC, the bulk RO can only modulate the operating frequency from 92.8MHz to 127MHz, with the operating current varies from 67.8uA to 129uA. Therefore, from both view of power and performance, the adjust ability of 22FDX circuits with back bias are much stronger than that of 28HPC circuits with body bias.","PeriodicalId":333587,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference (S3S)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference (S3S)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/S3S.2017.8309225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, the body bias in 28nm Bulk and the back bias in 22nm FDSOI are analyzed and compared from two aspects: power consumption and circuit performance. Taking a 65-stage ring oscillator (RO) with 4-level frequency divider as an example, transistor lengths are all set to 30nm, post simulation results show that, for 22FDX RO, the operating frequency can adjust from 57.8MHz to 206MHz, with the operating current varies from 24uA to 91uA; while for 28HPC, the bulk RO can only modulate the operating frequency from 92.8MHz to 127MHz, with the operating current varies from 67.8uA to 129uA. Therefore, from both view of power and performance, the adjust ability of 22FDX circuits with back bias are much stronger than that of 28HPC circuits with body bias.
28HPC的体偏和22FDX的背偏的功率和性能比较
本文从功耗和电路性能两个方面分析比较了28nm Bulk器件的体偏置和22nm FDSOI器件的背偏置。以带4级分频器的65级环形振荡器(RO)为例,晶体管长度均设置为30nm,后仿真结果表明,对于22FDX的RO,工作频率可以在57.8MHz到206MHz之间调节,工作电流在24uA到91uA之间变化;而对于28HPC,本体RO只能调制92.8MHz到127MHz的工作频率,工作电流在67.8uA到129uA之间变化。因此,从功率和性能的角度来看,带背偏置的22FDX电路的调节能力要比带身偏置的28HPC电路强得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信