The Impact of a Premium Based Tick Size on Equity Option Liquidity

Thanos Verousis, Owain ap Gwilym, Nikolaos Voukelatos
{"title":"The Impact of a Premium Based Tick Size on Equity Option Liquidity","authors":"Thanos Verousis, Owain ap Gwilym, Nikolaos Voukelatos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2499132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On June 2, 2009, NYSE LIFFE Amsterdam reduced the tick size for options trading at prices below € 0.20 from € 0.05 to € 0.01 and on April 1, 2010, the exchange increased the price threshold to € 0.50. We study the effect of that tick size reduction on the liquidity of individual equity options. In this respect, this study is uniquely positioned in the options context where moneyness is a clear additional factor in the implementation of the tick size changes. We show that, in general, quoted and traded option liquidity increased but at a rate decreasing with option moneyness. Real costs fell more for the lower priced contracts. Importantly, we show that the ability of the market to absorb larger trades has potentially diminished after the change in the tick size. We document a substantial increase in quote revisions which implies an increase in price competition and, as a result, an improvement in market quality. Finally, the decrease in the tick size led to an increase in hedging activity using deep‐out‐of‐the‐money puts. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 36:397–417, 2016","PeriodicalId":177064,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Derivatives (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Derivatives (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2499132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

On June 2, 2009, NYSE LIFFE Amsterdam reduced the tick size for options trading at prices below € 0.20 from € 0.05 to € 0.01 and on April 1, 2010, the exchange increased the price threshold to € 0.50. We study the effect of that tick size reduction on the liquidity of individual equity options. In this respect, this study is uniquely positioned in the options context where moneyness is a clear additional factor in the implementation of the tick size changes. We show that, in general, quoted and traded option liquidity increased but at a rate decreasing with option moneyness. Real costs fell more for the lower priced contracts. Importantly, we show that the ability of the market to absorb larger trades has potentially diminished after the change in the tick size. We document a substantial increase in quote revisions which implies an increase in price competition and, as a result, an improvement in market quality. Finally, the decrease in the tick size led to an increase in hedging activity using deep‐out‐of‐the‐money puts. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 36:397–417, 2016
基于溢价的点对股票期权流动性的影响
2009年6月2日,纽交所阿姆斯特丹国际金融期货交易所(NYSE LIFFE Amsterdam)将价格低于0.20欧元的期权交易的点位从0.05欧元降至0.01欧元,并于2010年4月1日将价格门槛提高至0.50欧元。我们研究了期权价格变动对个人股票期权流动性的影响。在这方面,本研究在期权环境中具有独特的定位,在期权环境中,金钱是实施期权大小变化的一个明显的附加因素。我们发现,一般情况下,期权报价和交易的流动性随着期权货币性的增加而增加,但以降低的速度增加。价格较低的合约的实际成本下降幅度更大。重要的是,我们表明,市场吸收更大的交易的能力在变动后可能会减弱。我们记录了报价修订的大幅增加,这意味着价格竞争的增加,从而提高了市场质量。最后,点差大小的减小导致使用深度出币看跌期权的对冲活动增加。©2015 Wiley期刊公司[j]《马可福音》36:397 - 417,2016
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信