An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength of Composite Resin and Activa Kids Bioactive Restorative for Use in Strip Crowns

Mohamed Labeeb KP, K. Reshma Pai, Evette Natasha Dsouza, L. Pallavi K., Patilla Amreen Shaban, Raksha S Shetty
{"title":"An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Strength of Composite Resin and Activa Kids Bioactive Restorative for Use in Strip Crowns","authors":"Mohamed Labeeb KP, K. Reshma Pai, Evette Natasha Dsouza, L. Pallavi K., Patilla Amreen Shaban, Raksha S Shetty","doi":"10.26463/rjds.15_2_12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Advanced stages of early childhood caries requires complex measures such as strip crowns for the anterior teeth and stainless steel crowns for the posterior teeth. Composite resin is the traditional material of choice for use in strip crowns. ACTIVA KIDS Bio ACTIVE-RESTORATIVE is the first bioactive composite with pedo shade delivering all the chemical properties of glass-ionomer cement and physical properties of composite resins.Aim The aim of this study was to compare the fracture strengths of composite resin and ACTIVA KIDS BioActive Restorative Pulpdent USA when used with a strip crown for restoring primary anterior teeth.Methodology Twenty exfoliated non-carious human maxillary primary central and lateral incisors were selected for the study to receive strip crowns and the dimensions were standardized for all the samples. In Group I Composite resin Te-Encom Plus Ivoclar vivadent and in Group II ACTIVA Kids BioActive Restorative Pulpdent USA were used to fill the strip crowns respectively after etching and application of bonding agent. After light curing the samples strip crowns were then removed assessed for fracture strength under Universal testing machine. Fracture strength of both the groups was statistically analyzed and recorded using student ldquotrdquo test.Results The minimum to maximum force obtained was 235.08ndash682.71 N for Group 1 which when compared to Group II 167.57ndash449.29 N was higher. However fracture strength between both the groups p .062 showed no significant difference statistically. Deformation at break percentage has shown significant difference between both the groups p.004 which was higher for Group I 1.34 when compared to Group II 0.68.Conclusion The fracture strength of experimental group restored with ACTIVA Kids Bioactive Restorative was comparable with composite resin when used as a core material inside the strip crown for anterior restorations. ACTIVA Kids Bioactive Restorative can be a better material of choice compared to traditional composite resins because of its excellent chemical and physical properties. The data also showed the fracture strength of ACTIVA Kids Bioactive Restorative to be comparable to composite resins.","PeriodicalId":155332,"journal":{"name":"RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26463/rjds.15_2_12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Advanced stages of early childhood caries requires complex measures such as strip crowns for the anterior teeth and stainless steel crowns for the posterior teeth. Composite resin is the traditional material of choice for use in strip crowns. ACTIVA KIDS Bio ACTIVE-RESTORATIVE is the first bioactive composite with pedo shade delivering all the chemical properties of glass-ionomer cement and physical properties of composite resins.Aim The aim of this study was to compare the fracture strengths of composite resin and ACTIVA KIDS BioActive Restorative Pulpdent USA when used with a strip crown for restoring primary anterior teeth.Methodology Twenty exfoliated non-carious human maxillary primary central and lateral incisors were selected for the study to receive strip crowns and the dimensions were standardized for all the samples. In Group I Composite resin Te-Encom Plus Ivoclar vivadent and in Group II ACTIVA Kids BioActive Restorative Pulpdent USA were used to fill the strip crowns respectively after etching and application of bonding agent. After light curing the samples strip crowns were then removed assessed for fracture strength under Universal testing machine. Fracture strength of both the groups was statistically analyzed and recorded using student ldquotrdquo test.Results The minimum to maximum force obtained was 235.08ndash682.71 N for Group 1 which when compared to Group II 167.57ndash449.29 N was higher. However fracture strength between both the groups p .062 showed no significant difference statistically. Deformation at break percentage has shown significant difference between both the groups p.004 which was higher for Group I 1.34 when compared to Group II 0.68.Conclusion The fracture strength of experimental group restored with ACTIVA Kids Bioactive Restorative was comparable with composite resin when used as a core material inside the strip crown for anterior restorations. ACTIVA Kids Bioactive Restorative can be a better material of choice compared to traditional composite resins because of its excellent chemical and physical properties. The data also showed the fracture strength of ACTIVA Kids Bioactive Restorative to be comparable to composite resins.
复合树脂与Activa Kids生物活性修复体用于带状冠断裂强度的体外比较
儿童早期龋齿的晚期需要复杂的措施,如前牙的条带冠和后牙的不锈钢冠。复合树脂是用于带状冠的传统材料。ACTIVA KIDS Bio ACTIVE-RESTORATIVE是首款具有生物活性的复合材料,具有玻璃离子聚体水泥的所有化学特性和复合树脂的所有物理特性。目的比较复合树脂与ACTIVA KIDS BioActive Restorative Pulpdent USA配合带状冠修复前牙时的断裂强度。方法选择20个脱落无龋的人上颌初级中门牙和侧门牙进行条带冠,并对所有样本进行尺寸标准化。第一组采用复合树脂Te-Encom Plus Ivoclar vivadent,第二组采用ACTIVA Kids BioActive Restorative pulpent USA,分别在蚀刻后和粘结剂的应用后对冠体进行充填。光固化后取下条状冠,在万能试验机下进行断裂强度测试。对两组的断裂强度进行统计分析,采用student ldquotrdquo test进行记录。结果1组获得的最小与最大作用力为235.08ndash682.71 N,高于2组的167.57ndash449.29 N。两组的断裂强度p .062,差异无统计学意义。断裂变形百分比在两组之间有显著差异p.004,第一组为1.34,第二组为0.68。结论实验组采用ACTIVA Kids生物活性修复体作为前牙冠内核材料,其断裂强度与复合树脂相当。ACTIVA Kids Bioactive Restorative是一种比传统复合树脂更好的材料选择,因为它具有优异的化学和物理性能。数据还显示ACTIVA Kids Bioactive Restorative的断裂强度与复合树脂相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信