Evaluación de la producción científica de sustentabilidad ambiental en un centro público de investigación (cpi) del Conacyt (1982-2012)

Q3 Social Sciences

Revista de la Educacion Superior Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resu.2017.04.002

Alan Celaya Lozano , Diana Luque Agraz , Jaqueline García Hernández , José Antonio Amozurrutia de María y Campos , Juan Martín Preciado Rodríguez , Jesús Laborín Álvarez , Rafael Enrique Cabanillas López

{"title":"Evaluación de la producción científica de sustentabilidad ambiental en un centro público de investigación (cpi) del Conacyt (1982-2012)","authors":"Alan Celaya Lozano , Diana Luque Agraz , Jaqueline García Hernández , José Antonio Amozurrutia de María y Campos , Juan Martín Preciado Rodríguez , Jesús Laborín Álvarez , Rafael Enrique Cabanillas López","doi":"10.1016/j.resu.2017.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A hydrological, climatic and biodiversity crisis is recognized by several major international organizations. Although they are strategic in the development of public policy addressing such environmental issues, Conacyt's Public Research Institutions (<span>pri</span>) lack a systematic method for addressing their own performance when it comes to environmental justice. To contribute in this objective, we evaluated the environmental sustainability scientific production (<span>essp</span>) and its social and academic impact in one <span>pri</span> between the years of 1982 and 2012. We conclude that priorities at the federal level continue to prioritize other lines of research which are oriented towards the support of productivity in the private sector. At the same time while the environment continues to be recognized as part of a research agenda, it is of little interest to the public and private sectors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Educacion Superior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.resu.2017.04.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Educacion Superior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185276017300316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

A hydrological, climatic and biodiversity crisis is recognized by several major international organizations. Although they are strategic in the development of public policy addressing such environmental issues, Conacyt's Public Research Institutions (pri) lack a systematic method for addressing their own performance when it comes to environmental justice. To contribute in this objective, we evaluated the environmental sustainability scientific production (essp) and its social and academic impact in one pri between the years of 1982 and 2012. We conclude that priorities at the federal level continue to prioritize other lines of research which are oriented towards the support of productivity in the private sector. At the same time while the environment continues to be recognized as part of a research agenda, it is of little interest to the public and private sectors.

查看原文本刊更多论文

生产环境可持续性科学评估公共国家科学技术委员会(cpi)一个研究中心(1982-2012)

水文、气候和生物多样性危机已被几个主要国际组织所认识。尽管公共研究机构(pri)在制定解决此类环境问题的公共政策方面具有战略意义，但在环境正义方面，它们缺乏一种系统的方法来解决自己的表现。为了实现这一目标，我们对1982年至2012年间的环境可持续性科学生产(essp)及其社会和学术影响进行了评估。我们的结论是，联邦一级的优先事项继续优先考虑旨在支持私营部门生产力的其他研究方向。与此同时，虽然环境继续被认为是研究议程的一部分，但公共和私营部门对它几乎不感兴趣。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista de la Educacion Superior Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

26 weeks

期刊介绍： La Revista de la Educación Superior (RESU) es un medio que se propone publicar textos académicos originales sobre la educación superior mexicana, con apertura a la dimensión internacional. Sus destinatarios son tanto investigadores que trabajan temas de educación superior como directivos, especialistas e interesados en planeación, evaluación y gestión de las instituciones y sistemas de educación superior. Por consiguiente, se difunden artículos de investigación, ensayos académicos y reseñas críticas, que propicien que los lectores enriquezcan su bagaje conceptual y analítico, y amplíen su conocimiento acerca de los retos que enfrentan los sistemas e instituciones de educación superior en los entornos nacional e internacional.