Postural Implications of Back and Front squat using Biomechanical simulation

G. Renganathan, H. Barnamehei, Poongavanam Palani, Y. Kurita
{"title":"Postural Implications of Back and Front squat using Biomechanical simulation","authors":"G. Renganathan, H. Barnamehei, Poongavanam Palani, Y. Kurita","doi":"10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Squat is a closed kinetic chain exercise widely used for strength and conditioning applications. This exercise also supports the preparedness for multiple sports. In Physical rehabilitation, squatting is widely incorporated to strengthen the disorders and activate the muscle extensors. This study collected 3D Motion capture data from 5 healthy, trained individuals. Subjects with a history of injury were excluded. The study aims to examine the difference in kinematic variables between Front and Back squats without load conditions and their postural changes. The Kinematic profile was analyzed using computational musculoskeletal software - OpenSim. Based on the statistical results, it is indicated that there is no significant difference in the lower body joints (p< 0.05), contradicting the upper body joints (p >0.05), especially the spine. The peak joint angle value for the neck, spine, and shoulder in the sagittal plane during the Front squat were -21.53, 16.22, and 22.31 degrees, and during the Back squat were -31.68, 9.19, and 70.90 degrees, respectively. Further statistical test was performed using the Paired sample t-test, indicating a significant difference in knee, neck, spine, and shoulder. Hence, this study differentiates the joint angle variation during the two squat styles. The existence of a dominant component in the squat technique has been identified which potentially adds value and helps in curating the needs of patients requiring rehabilitative techniques. The variables analyzed in this study help identify additional parameters that aid in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of a dedicated posture restoration scheme, including squatting as part of the prescribed exercises.","PeriodicalId":180790,"journal":{"name":"2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Fifth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCT56650.2023.10179635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Squat is a closed kinetic chain exercise widely used for strength and conditioning applications. This exercise also supports the preparedness for multiple sports. In Physical rehabilitation, squatting is widely incorporated to strengthen the disorders and activate the muscle extensors. This study collected 3D Motion capture data from 5 healthy, trained individuals. Subjects with a history of injury were excluded. The study aims to examine the difference in kinematic variables between Front and Back squats without load conditions and their postural changes. The Kinematic profile was analyzed using computational musculoskeletal software - OpenSim. Based on the statistical results, it is indicated that there is no significant difference in the lower body joints (p< 0.05), contradicting the upper body joints (p >0.05), especially the spine. The peak joint angle value for the neck, spine, and shoulder in the sagittal plane during the Front squat were -21.53, 16.22, and 22.31 degrees, and during the Back squat were -31.68, 9.19, and 70.90 degrees, respectively. Further statistical test was performed using the Paired sample t-test, indicating a significant difference in knee, neck, spine, and shoulder. Hence, this study differentiates the joint angle variation during the two squat styles. The existence of a dominant component in the squat technique has been identified which potentially adds value and helps in curating the needs of patients requiring rehabilitative techniques. The variables analyzed in this study help identify additional parameters that aid in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of a dedicated posture restoration scheme, including squatting as part of the prescribed exercises.
使用生物力学模拟后蹲和前蹲的姿势含义
深蹲是一种封闭的动力链运动,广泛用于力量和调节应用。这个练习也支持多种运动的准备。在物理康复中,深蹲被广泛用于强化疾病和激活肌肉伸肌。这项研究收集了5名健康、训练有素的人的3D动作捕捉数据。有损伤史的受试者被排除在外。本研究旨在探讨无负荷条件下前蹲和后蹲运动学变量的差异及其姿势变化。使用计算肌肉骨骼软件- OpenSim对运动学剖面进行分析。从统计结果来看,下半身关节的差异无统计学意义(p< 0.05),与上半身关节,尤其是脊柱的差异不显著(p >0.05)。前蹲时颈部、脊柱和肩部矢状面关节角峰值分别为-21.53度、16.22度和22.31度,后蹲时颈部、脊柱和肩部关节角峰值分别为-31.68度、9.19度和70.90度。进一步采用配对样本t检验进行统计学检验,显示膝关节、颈部、脊柱和肩部存在显著差异。因此,本研究区分了两种深蹲方式中关节角度的变化。深蹲技术的一个主要组成部分的存在已经被确定,它潜在地增加了价值,并有助于管理需要康复技术的患者的需求。本研究中分析的变量有助于确定其他参数,这些参数有助于对专用姿势恢复方案进行定性和定量分析,包括将深蹲作为规定练习的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信