Ties that Bind: The Kin System as a Mechanism of Income-Hiding between Spouses in Rural Ghana

C. Castilla
{"title":"Ties that Bind: The Kin System as a Mechanism of Income-Hiding between Spouses in Rural Ghana","authors":"C. Castilla","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1996882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I present a simple model of intra-household allocation between spouses to show that when the quantity of resources available to the household is not perfectly observed by both spouses, hiding of income can occur even when revelation of the additional resources increases bargaining power. From the model, a test to identify income hiding empirically is derived. For the empirical application, a household survey conducted in Southern Ghana is used. I exploit the variation in the degree of asymmetric information between spouses, measured as the difference between the husband’s own reporting of farm sales and the wife’s reporting of his farm sales, to test whether the allocation of resources is consistent with hiding. For identification, the wife’s clan and the husband’s bride-wealth payments upon marriage are used as instruments for asymmetric information. My findings indicate that allocations are suggestive of men hiding farm sales income in the form of gifts to extended family members, which are not closely monitored. It is unclear whether hiding has negative consequences in the long run because hiding occurs in the form of gifts, instead of expenditure in alcohol or tobacco. If the gifts represent a form of risk-sharing, then these gifts will return to the household in the future, and hiding is not necessarily inefficient. However, if these gifts are motivated by social pressure then hiding can result on poverty traps caused by kin system. The wife’s response is also suggestive of hiding. As information asymmetries increase, she reduces her expenditure in non-essential items, such as prepared foods and oil, but increases personal spending. Expenditure in oil is one of the main sources of calories among poor households in the region.","PeriodicalId":400873,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Information","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1996882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

I present a simple model of intra-household allocation between spouses to show that when the quantity of resources available to the household is not perfectly observed by both spouses, hiding of income can occur even when revelation of the additional resources increases bargaining power. From the model, a test to identify income hiding empirically is derived. For the empirical application, a household survey conducted in Southern Ghana is used. I exploit the variation in the degree of asymmetric information between spouses, measured as the difference between the husband’s own reporting of farm sales and the wife’s reporting of his farm sales, to test whether the allocation of resources is consistent with hiding. For identification, the wife’s clan and the husband’s bride-wealth payments upon marriage are used as instruments for asymmetric information. My findings indicate that allocations are suggestive of men hiding farm sales income in the form of gifts to extended family members, which are not closely monitored. It is unclear whether hiding has negative consequences in the long run because hiding occurs in the form of gifts, instead of expenditure in alcohol or tobacco. If the gifts represent a form of risk-sharing, then these gifts will return to the household in the future, and hiding is not necessarily inefficient. However, if these gifts are motivated by social pressure then hiding can result on poverty traps caused by kin system. The wife’s response is also suggestive of hiding. As information asymmetries increase, she reduces her expenditure in non-essential items, such as prepared foods and oil, but increases personal spending. Expenditure in oil is one of the main sources of calories among poor households in the region.
纽带:亲属制度作为加纳农村配偶之间隐藏收入的一种机制
我提出了一个配偶之间家庭内部分配的简单模型,以表明当家庭可用资源的数量没有被配偶双方完全观察到时,即使披露额外资源增加了议价能力,也可能发生隐瞒收入的情况。在此基础上,推导出一个实证检验收入隐藏的方法。对于实证应用,使用了在加纳南部进行的家庭调查。我利用配偶之间信息不对称程度的差异(以丈夫自己报告的农场销售情况与妻子报告的农场销售情况之间的差异来衡量)来测试资源的分配是否与隐藏一致。为了识别身份,妻子的氏族和丈夫在结婚时的嫁妆被用作信息不对称的工具。我的研究结果表明,这些分配表明,男性将农场销售收入以礼物的形式隐藏起来,送给大家庭成员,而这些礼物没有受到密切监控。目前尚不清楚从长远来看,隐藏是否会产生负面影响,因为隐藏是以礼物的形式出现的,而不是在酒精或烟草上的支出。如果礼物代表了一种风险分担的形式,那么这些礼物将在未来回到家庭,隐藏并不一定是低效的。然而,如果这些礼物是出于社会压力,那么隐藏起来可能会导致亲属制度造成的贫困陷阱。妻子的反应也暗示了他在躲藏。随着信息不对称的增加,她减少了在非必需品上的支出,比如预制食品和油,但增加了个人支出。石油支出是该地区贫困家庭热量的主要来源之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信