Wool textiles and archaeometry: testing reliability of archaeological wool fibre diameter measurements

I. Skals, M. Gleba, M. Taube, U. Mannering
{"title":"Wool textiles and archaeometry: testing reliability of archaeological wool fibre diameter measurements","authors":"I. Skals, M. Gleba, M. Taube, U. Mannering","doi":"10.1080/21662282.2018.1495917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Characterisations of ancient sheep breeds and wool types and theories about wool fibre processing are integral parts of textile archaeology. The studies build on statistical calculations of measurements of wool fibre diameters and reveal characteristics of the yarns that are attributed to the available raw wool and to the production methods of the time. Different microscope types have been used for data collection. Presently digital images from either scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or transmitted light microscopy (TLM) are the preferred methods. The advantage of SEM is the good depth of field at high magnification, while TLM is simpler to use and more readily available. Several classification systems have been developed to facilitate the interpretation of the results. In this article, the comparability of the results from these two methods and from the use of different magnifications in general is examined based on the analyses of a large number of the Danish prehistoric textiles. The results do not indicate superiority of one microscope type in favour of another. Rather, they reveal differences in the calculations that can be ascribed to the diversity of the fibres in the individual yarns as well as to the methodology and the magnification level.","PeriodicalId":191998,"journal":{"name":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish Journal of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2018.1495917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Characterisations of ancient sheep breeds and wool types and theories about wool fibre processing are integral parts of textile archaeology. The studies build on statistical calculations of measurements of wool fibre diameters and reveal characteristics of the yarns that are attributed to the available raw wool and to the production methods of the time. Different microscope types have been used for data collection. Presently digital images from either scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or transmitted light microscopy (TLM) are the preferred methods. The advantage of SEM is the good depth of field at high magnification, while TLM is simpler to use and more readily available. Several classification systems have been developed to facilitate the interpretation of the results. In this article, the comparability of the results from these two methods and from the use of different magnifications in general is examined based on the analyses of a large number of the Danish prehistoric textiles. The results do not indicate superiority of one microscope type in favour of another. Rather, they reveal differences in the calculations that can be ascribed to the diversity of the fibres in the individual yarns as well as to the methodology and the magnification level.
羊毛纺织品和考古测量:考古羊毛纤维直径测量的可靠性测试
古代绵羊品种和羊毛种类的特征以及羊毛纤维加工理论是纺织考古学的重要组成部分。这些研究建立在羊毛纤维直径测量的统计计算的基础上,揭示了纱线的特性,这些特性归因于可用的原羊毛和当时的生产方法。不同类型的显微镜被用于数据收集。目前,来自扫描电子显微镜(SEM)或透射光显微镜(TLM)的数字图像是首选的方法。扫描电镜的优点是在高倍率下具有良好的景深,而TLM使用更简单,更容易获得。为了便于对结果的解释,已经开发了几种分类系统。在本文中,通过对大量丹麦史前纺织品的分析,对这两种方法和使用不同放大率的结果的可比性进行了研究。结果并不表明一种显微镜比另一种显微镜优越。相反,它们揭示了计算中的差异,这些差异可以归因于单个纱线中纤维的多样性以及方法和放大水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信