{"title":"Ex Uno Lapide: The making present of absence","authors":"Konrad Buhagiar, G. Dreyfuss, E. Joris","doi":"10.24135/ijara.v0i0.553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper comments on a drawing protocol entitled the “Monolith Drawing”, with which an architectural figure is extracted out of a single volume, synchronising analogue thinking with computational development, to enter history through our capacity to long for the experience of something that is absent. The Lacanian interpretation assumes there cannot be absence in an objective world, for absence can only exist through symbolic or representative means. It is through the representational means of the Monolith Drawing that we enable ourselves, as architects, to design presence where there is none. \nThis research explores and (re)deploys the notion of ex uno lapide in contemporary architectural production. Such creative practice recovers a tradition linking geology with architectonic drawing and operates in conceptual space through means of contained sets of formal operations to generate a particular kind of architecture. \nThe Monolith Drawing is here explained in relation to the design of a museum extension to house a tapestry cycle by Peter Paul Rubens, adjacent to St John’s Co-Cathedral in Valletta. These tapestries represent the idea of transubstantiation. In response, the museum’s design acts as a closed vessel, a monumental reliquary, enabling a closed and controlled environment to ensure the conservation of the artwork. The reliquary is interpreted as a container of meaning, directing a reciprocal gaze towards the idea of meaningful absence. The Monolith Drawing installs two important principles. The idea of the mirror-construct, in which an object is depicted using parallel lines to project its mirror image and allow twofold vision, outwards (res extensa) and inwards (res cogitans); and the idea of ex uno lapide – a strategy where architecture is carved out of solid mass. This carving is guided by allowing the depicted object and its mirror image to intersect. Its transcriptions allow for a drawing with history; a tracing of its own tracing.","PeriodicalId":403565,"journal":{"name":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interstices: journal of architecture and related arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/ijara.v0i0.553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper comments on a drawing protocol entitled the “Monolith Drawing”, with which an architectural figure is extracted out of a single volume, synchronising analogue thinking with computational development, to enter history through our capacity to long for the experience of something that is absent. The Lacanian interpretation assumes there cannot be absence in an objective world, for absence can only exist through symbolic or representative means. It is through the representational means of the Monolith Drawing that we enable ourselves, as architects, to design presence where there is none.
This research explores and (re)deploys the notion of ex uno lapide in contemporary architectural production. Such creative practice recovers a tradition linking geology with architectonic drawing and operates in conceptual space through means of contained sets of formal operations to generate a particular kind of architecture.
The Monolith Drawing is here explained in relation to the design of a museum extension to house a tapestry cycle by Peter Paul Rubens, adjacent to St John’s Co-Cathedral in Valletta. These tapestries represent the idea of transubstantiation. In response, the museum’s design acts as a closed vessel, a monumental reliquary, enabling a closed and controlled environment to ensure the conservation of the artwork. The reliquary is interpreted as a container of meaning, directing a reciprocal gaze towards the idea of meaningful absence. The Monolith Drawing installs two important principles. The idea of the mirror-construct, in which an object is depicted using parallel lines to project its mirror image and allow twofold vision, outwards (res extensa) and inwards (res cogitans); and the idea of ex uno lapide – a strategy where architecture is carved out of solid mass. This carving is guided by allowing the depicted object and its mirror image to intersect. Its transcriptions allow for a drawing with history; a tracing of its own tracing.
本文评论了一种名为“单体绘画”的绘画协议,该协议将一个建筑图形从单个卷中提取出来,将模拟思维与计算发展同步,通过我们渴望体验某些缺失的东西的能力进入历史。拉康的解释假设在一个客观的世界里不可能有缺席,因为缺席只能通过象征或代表的方式存在。作为建筑师,正是通过单体画的具象手段,我们才能设计出没有存在的存在。本研究在当代建筑生产中探索并(重新)部署了“非自然”的概念。这种创造性的实践恢复了将地质与建筑绘图联系起来的传统,并通过包含的形式操作集在概念空间中操作,以产生特定类型的建筑。这里解释了巨石绘画与博物馆扩建设计的关系,该扩建是为了容纳彼得·保罗·鲁本斯(Peter Paul Rubens)设计的挂毯循环,毗邻瓦莱塔的圣约翰大教堂。这些挂毯代表了变形的概念。作为回应,博物馆的设计就像一个封闭的容器,一个纪念性的圣物箱,提供一个封闭和受控的环境,以确保艺术品的保护。圣物箱被解释为一个意义的容器,引导着对有意义缺席的想法的相互凝视。巨石绘图安装了两个重要的原则。镜像构造的概念,用平行线来描绘一个物体,投射出它的镜像,并允许双重视觉,向外(res extensa)和向内(res cogitans);此外,建筑师还提出了一种将建筑从固体中雕刻出来的策略。这种雕刻是通过允许被描绘的对象和它的镜像相交来引导的。它的转录允许与历史绘图;对自己的跟踪的跟踪。