Rethinking professional development for public engagement with research: A way to improve uptake and impact of training?

H. Featherstone, David Owen
{"title":"Rethinking professional development for public engagement with research: A way to improve uptake and impact of training?","authors":"H. Featherstone, David Owen","doi":"10.18546/rfa.04.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Training is often cited as key to embedding public engagement in universities. The literature and professional discussions on public engagement training tend to focus on the training intervention itself (for example, the content and delivery formats), rather than on the learner (for\n example, current levels of public engagement practice, longer-term career aspirations, and workplace environment). In this article, we share our reflections on putting the learner first. We draw on our own general experiences and in particular our ChallengeCPD@Bath programme (funded by UK\n Research and Innovation through the Strategic Support to Expedite Embedding Public Engagement with Research call). We argue that many of the challenges associated with the provision and uptake of training and professional development for public engagement with research are not unique to public\n engagement but relate more broadly to perceptions of training and professional development that exist within the academy. However, putting the learner at the heart of professional development means understanding their public engagement needs, their broader academic/career goals, their disciplinary/institutional\n cultures of training and their disciplinary/institutional cultures of public engagement. It also entails a shift in how we evaluate interventions, moving beyond measures of satisfaction or enjoyment towards long-term evaluation, in particular accounting for the extent to which learning can\n be, and is, applied on the job, or looking at how it might change behaviour in the workplace.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research for All","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18546/rfa.04.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Training is often cited as key to embedding public engagement in universities. The literature and professional discussions on public engagement training tend to focus on the training intervention itself (for example, the content and delivery formats), rather than on the learner (for example, current levels of public engagement practice, longer-term career aspirations, and workplace environment). In this article, we share our reflections on putting the learner first. We draw on our own general experiences and in particular our ChallengeCPD@Bath programme (funded by UK Research and Innovation through the Strategic Support to Expedite Embedding Public Engagement with Research call). We argue that many of the challenges associated with the provision and uptake of training and professional development for public engagement with research are not unique to public engagement but relate more broadly to perceptions of training and professional development that exist within the academy. However, putting the learner at the heart of professional development means understanding their public engagement needs, their broader academic/career goals, their disciplinary/institutional cultures of training and their disciplinary/institutional cultures of public engagement. It also entails a shift in how we evaluate interventions, moving beyond measures of satisfaction or enjoyment towards long-term evaluation, in particular accounting for the extent to which learning can be, and is, applied on the job, or looking at how it might change behaviour in the workplace.
重新思考公众参与研究的专业发展:提高培训的吸收和影响的方法?
培训经常被认为是将公众参与纳入大学的关键。关于公共参与培训的文献和专业讨论倾向于关注培训干预本身(例如,内容和交付格式),而不是学习者(例如,当前的公共参与实践水平,长期职业抱负和工作场所环境)。在这篇文章中,我们将分享我们对“学习者至上”的看法。我们借鉴了我们自己的一般经验,特别是我们的ChallengeCPD@Bath计划(由英国研究与创新通过战略支持加快嵌入公众参与的研究呼吁)。我们认为,与提供和接受公众参与研究的培训和专业发展相关的许多挑战并不是公众参与所特有的,而是与学院内部存在的培训和专业发展的观念更广泛地相关。然而,将学习者置于专业发展的核心意味着理解他们的公共参与需求、他们更广泛的学术/职业目标、他们的学科/机构培训文化以及他们的学科/机构公共参与文化。它还需要我们在评估干预措施的方式上发生转变,从满意度或享受的衡量标准转向长期评估,特别是考虑到学习可以在多大程度上应用于工作,或者研究它如何改变工作场所的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信