Performance of modern web protocols over satellite links

Jörg Deutschmann, K. Hielscher, Reinhard German
{"title":"Performance of modern web protocols over satellite links","authors":"Jörg Deutschmann, K. Hielscher, Reinhard German","doi":"10.1049/icp.2022.0564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet changes towards more encrypted traffic and encrypted protocols. This is due to an increase in home office use with Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and new protocols especially QUIC. Both VPNs and QUIC are problematic for Internet access via geostationary satellites, because Performance Enhancing Proxies, which mitigate the negative effects of high latency links, cannot be applied anymore. Considering recent developments, we run performance measurements with an artificial website, different protocols (HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, HTTP/3 and QUIC), with and without VPNs, and real satellite links (four European geostationary satellite systems and the new Starlink low-earth orbit megaconstellation). The measurement results for geostationary satellite Internet access show (a) lowest loading times with HTTP/2 and PEPs, (b) HTTP/3 and QUIC cannot be optimized by PEPs but still outperforms HTTP/1.1 with PEPs, (c) in case of VPNs, i.e., when PEPs are not applicable, HTTP/3 and QUIC performs bests. Starlink has lower loading times than geostationary Internet access regardless of VPNs. We also review current IETF activities and introduce the new QUICSAT project, which aims at improving protocols for satellite networks.","PeriodicalId":401042,"journal":{"name":"38th International Communications Satellite Systems Conference (ICSSC 2021)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"38th International Communications Satellite Systems Conference (ICSSC 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2022.0564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Internet changes towards more encrypted traffic and encrypted protocols. This is due to an increase in home office use with Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and new protocols especially QUIC. Both VPNs and QUIC are problematic for Internet access via geostationary satellites, because Performance Enhancing Proxies, which mitigate the negative effects of high latency links, cannot be applied anymore. Considering recent developments, we run performance measurements with an artificial website, different protocols (HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, HTTP/3 and QUIC), with and without VPNs, and real satellite links (four European geostationary satellite systems and the new Starlink low-earth orbit megaconstellation). The measurement results for geostationary satellite Internet access show (a) lowest loading times with HTTP/2 and PEPs, (b) HTTP/3 and QUIC cannot be optimized by PEPs but still outperforms HTTP/1.1 with PEPs, (c) in case of VPNs, i.e., when PEPs are not applicable, HTTP/3 and QUIC performs bests. Starlink has lower loading times than geostationary Internet access regardless of VPNs. We also review current IETF activities and introduce the new QUICSAT project, which aims at improving protocols for satellite networks.
现代网络协议在卫星链路上的性能
互联网转向更多的加密流量和加密协议。这是由于家庭办公室使用虚拟专用网(vpn)和新协议(尤其是QUIC)的增加。vpn和QUIC对于通过地球同步卫星访问互联网都是有问题的,因为不能再应用性能增强代理,它可以减轻高延迟链路的负面影响。考虑到最近的发展,我们使用一个人工网站、不同的协议(HTTP/1.1、HTTP/2、HTTP/3和QUIC)、有或没有vpn和真正的卫星链路(四个欧洲地球同步卫星系统和新的星链低地球轨道巨型星座)来运行性能测量。对地球静止卫星互联网接入的测量结果显示:(a) HTTP/2和pep的加载时间最低,(b) HTTP/3和QUIC无法通过pep进行优化,但仍然优于使用pep的HTTP/1.1, (c)在vpn的情况下,即当pep不适用时,HTTP/3和QUIC表现最佳。无论使用vpn, Starlink的加载时间都比地球同步互联网接入短。我们还回顾了当前的IETF活动,并介绍了新的QUICSAT项目,该项目旨在改进卫星网络的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信