Differences of Natural Science and Social Science Pre-service Student’s Perceptions for Biotechnology

S. Hariyadi, B. Wahono, Suratno, J. Prihatin, B. H. Siswati
{"title":"Differences of Natural Science and Social Science Pre-service Student’s Perceptions for Biotechnology","authors":"S. Hariyadi, B. Wahono, Suratno, J. Prihatin, B. H. Siswati","doi":"10.56013/bio.v12i1.2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to investigate the importance of infusing SSI (Socioscientific Issue) into STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics)-based Biotechnology learning by capturing the perceptions of students in Natural Science and Social Science. This is intended to make learning more effective because it helps students to achieve the comprehension of the material being taught.  The research apply mix methods by capturing quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data are collected from the percentage of answers from 291 students who have filled out quizzes through online surveys. While qualitative data is collected from garnering students’ answers through unstructured interviews. The results showed that students of Natural Science discussed biotechnology more technically and normatively resulting in product effects, while students of Social Science focused more on the policy and risk aspects of biotech products. It is the difference in perception between the two majors that requires the SSI approach to be infused into the STEM approach. The benefits of such infusionare improved students' HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills), which is in line with the current learning trend of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. \n  \nKeywords: SSI, Biotechnology, STEM education, HOTS","PeriodicalId":240009,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL BIOSHELL","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL BIOSHELL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56013/bio.v12i1.2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the importance of infusing SSI (Socioscientific Issue) into STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics)-based Biotechnology learning by capturing the perceptions of students in Natural Science and Social Science. This is intended to make learning more effective because it helps students to achieve the comprehension of the material being taught.  The research apply mix methods by capturing quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data are collected from the percentage of answers from 291 students who have filled out quizzes through online surveys. While qualitative data is collected from garnering students’ answers through unstructured interviews. The results showed that students of Natural Science discussed biotechnology more technically and normatively resulting in product effects, while students of Social Science focused more on the policy and risk aspects of biotech products. It is the difference in perception between the two majors that requires the SSI approach to be infused into the STEM approach. The benefits of such infusionare improved students' HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills), which is in line with the current learning trend of the Industrial Revolution 4.0.   Keywords: SSI, Biotechnology, STEM education, HOTS
自然科学与社会科学职前学生对生物科技认知的差异
本研究旨在通过捕捉学生对自然科学和社会科学的看法,探讨将SSI(社会科学问题)注入STEM(科学,技术,工程,数学)为基础的生物技术学习的重要性。这样做的目的是使学习更有效,因为它有助于学生理解所教授的材料。本研究采用定量数据和定性数据相结合的方法。定量数据来自291名学生通过在线调查填写的测验的回答百分比。而定性数据则是通过非结构化访谈收集学生的答案。结果表明,自然科学专业的学生更多地从技术和规范的角度讨论生物技术,从而产生产品效应,而社会科学专业的学生更多地关注生物技术产品的政策和风险方面。这两个专业之间的认知差异需要将SSI方法融入到STEM方法中。这种灌输的好处是提高了学生的HOTS(高阶思维技能),这符合当前工业革命4.0的学习趋势。关键词:SSI,生物技术,STEM教育,热点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信