Band planting: a new restoration technique under the multi-criteria analysis of ecological functionality

B. S. Francisco, E. Viveiros, F. B. Dutra, Paulo Cesar Souza, Rafael Paranhos Martins, R. Passaretti, J. M. S. Silva, F. Piña-Rodrigues
{"title":"Band planting: a new restoration technique under the multi-criteria analysis of ecological functionality","authors":"B. S. Francisco, E. Viveiros, F. B. Dutra, Paulo Cesar Souza, Rafael Paranhos Martins, R. Passaretti, J. M. S. Silva, F. Piña-Rodrigues","doi":"10.5327/z2176-94781028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated band planting (BP) to assess its efficiency in the early restoring of ecological processes using a multi-criteria protocol known as Framework for the Evaluation of Natural Resource Management Systems Incorporating Sustainability Indicators (MESMIS) to obtain the ecological functionality consolidation index (EFCI). We sampled a 4.3 ha-1 plantation, aged 3 years, with BP, 1.5-m space between bands, 2-m space between seedlings, and a 3.5-m band of natural regeneration, ten areas with conventional planting (CP), aged 5 years, in the coverage and diversity models, and ten areas restored by natural regeneration (NR), aged 4 years. Sampling was carried out in 36 10 m x 10 m blocks, totaling 144 plots, 15 blocks for BP, 11 blocks for CP, and 10 blocks for NR. Species richness was similar between the areas; however, there was a significant difference between BP and the other areas (CP and NR) by the Dunn’s test (p < 0.05). The NR area had the highest diversity (H' = 3.03; J' = 0.76), followed by BP (H' = 2.56; J' = 0.62), and CP (H' = 2.0; J' = 0.48), whereas the BP area (4.348 ind.ha-1) had the highest density. The BP had the highest EFCI for diversity (0.100), control, and management (0.067) compared to NR, for diversity (0.022), and similar to CP in soil protection and nutrient cycling (0.047). BP was efficient in recovering early ecological processes under conditions similar to fragments in the initial stage of succession.","PeriodicalId":352759,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/z2176-94781028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated band planting (BP) to assess its efficiency in the early restoring of ecological processes using a multi-criteria protocol known as Framework for the Evaluation of Natural Resource Management Systems Incorporating Sustainability Indicators (MESMIS) to obtain the ecological functionality consolidation index (EFCI). We sampled a 4.3 ha-1 plantation, aged 3 years, with BP, 1.5-m space between bands, 2-m space between seedlings, and a 3.5-m band of natural regeneration, ten areas with conventional planting (CP), aged 5 years, in the coverage and diversity models, and ten areas restored by natural regeneration (NR), aged 4 years. Sampling was carried out in 36 10 m x 10 m blocks, totaling 144 plots, 15 blocks for BP, 11 blocks for CP, and 10 blocks for NR. Species richness was similar between the areas; however, there was a significant difference between BP and the other areas (CP and NR) by the Dunn’s test (p < 0.05). The NR area had the highest diversity (H' = 3.03; J' = 0.76), followed by BP (H' = 2.56; J' = 0.62), and CP (H' = 2.0; J' = 0.48), whereas the BP area (4.348 ind.ha-1) had the highest density. The BP had the highest EFCI for diversity (0.100), control, and management (0.067) compared to NR, for diversity (0.022), and similar to CP in soil protection and nutrient cycling (0.047). BP was efficient in recovering early ecological processes under conditions similar to fragments in the initial stage of succession.
带状种植:多指标生态功能分析下的一种新的修复技术
我们利用一种多标准协议,即包含可持续性指标的自然资源管理系统评估框架(MESMIS),评估带状种植(BP)在早期生态过程恢复中的效率,从而获得生态功能巩固指数(EFCI)。我们选取了一个4.3 ha-1的人工林,树龄为3年,具有BP,带间距为1.5 m,幼苗间距为2 m,自然更新带为3.5 m,覆盖度和多样性模型中10个采用常规种植(CP)的区域,树龄为5年,10个采用自然更新(NR)恢复的区域,树龄为4年。在36个10 m × 10 m的样区共144个样区,BP样区15个,CP样区11个,NR样区10个。但经Dunn 's检验,BP与其他区域(CP和NR)差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。NR区多样性最高(H′= 3.03;J′= 0.76),其次是BP (H′= 2.56;J′= 0.62),CP (H′= 2.0;J′= 0.48),BP区(4.348 ind.ha-1)密度最高。BP在多样性方面的EFCI最高(0.100),控制和管理方面的EFCI最高(0.067),多样性方面的EFCI最高(0.022),土壤保护和养分循环方面的EFCI与CP相似(0.047)。BP在类似演替初期片段的条件下,对早期生态过程的恢复是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信