T. S. Eliot’s Genealogical Exploration of Leibniz’s Monadism and Problems of Substance

Hong-Seop Lee
{"title":"T. S. Eliot’s Genealogical Exploration of Leibniz’s Monadism and Problems of Substance","authors":"Hong-Seop Lee","doi":"10.14364/t.s.eliot.2023.32.2.193-219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this article is to examine the significance of T. S. Eliot’s genealogical exploration of Leibniz’s monadology in his “The Development of Leibniz’s Monadism” published in 1916. Critical of the contemporary Bertrand Russsel’s purely logical approach toward Leibniz’s metaphysics, Eliot pays keen attention to the theoretical and, especially, theological backgrounds from which Leibniz’s monadology emerges. As an origin of Leibniz’s thought of the monad, Eliot pinpoints Aristotle’s concept of the substance. Merging Aristotle’s concept of the substance with a modern theory of atomism, the monad of Leibniz is immaterial, individable, and eternal. Yet, Eliot makes conclusions that there exist unresolvable gaps between Leibniz’s scientific and theological orientation that underlies his monadology, and that he ultimately fails to accomplish his “ambitious” project to restore Christian belief in the immortality of the soul.","PeriodicalId":413558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the T. S. Eliot Society of Korea","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the T. S. Eliot Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14364/t.s.eliot.2023.32.2.193-219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to examine the significance of T. S. Eliot’s genealogical exploration of Leibniz’s monadology in his “The Development of Leibniz’s Monadism” published in 1916. Critical of the contemporary Bertrand Russsel’s purely logical approach toward Leibniz’s metaphysics, Eliot pays keen attention to the theoretical and, especially, theological backgrounds from which Leibniz’s monadology emerges. As an origin of Leibniz’s thought of the monad, Eliot pinpoints Aristotle’s concept of the substance. Merging Aristotle’s concept of the substance with a modern theory of atomism, the monad of Leibniz is immaterial, individable, and eternal. Yet, Eliot makes conclusions that there exist unresolvable gaps between Leibniz’s scientific and theological orientation that underlies his monadology, and that he ultimately fails to accomplish his “ambitious” project to restore Christian belief in the immortality of the soul.
艾略特对莱布尼茨一元论和物质问题的宗谱探索
本文的主要目的是考察艾略特在1916年发表的《莱布尼茨Monadism的发展》一书中对莱布尼茨Monadism进行系谱探索的意义。艾略特批判了同时代的伯特兰·罗素对莱布尼茨形而上学的纯逻辑态度,并对莱布尼茨一元论产生的理论背景,尤其是神学背景给予了高度关注。作为莱布尼茨单一性思想的起源,艾略特准确地指出了亚里士多德的实体概念。莱布尼茨的单子融合了亚里士多德的物质概念和现代原子论理论,是非物质的、可分的和永恒的。然而,艾略特得出结论,莱布尼茨的科学取向和神学取向之间存在着无法解决的差距,这是他一元论的基础,他最终未能完成他的“雄心勃勃的”计划,即恢复基督教对灵魂不朽的信仰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信