The Ethical Duty of Physicians to Strengthen Their Own Immunization and Childhood Vaccination

B. S. Junior, V. Beltrame, F. Hellmann
{"title":"The Ethical Duty of Physicians to Strengthen Their Own Immunization and Childhood Vaccination","authors":"B. S. Junior, V. Beltrame, F. Hellmann","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccines are one of the most significant discoveries of humanity and are responsible for saving millions of lives around the world. However, their unquestionable successes are criticized and lead to the refusal of parents to vaccinate their children, which causes severe public health problems. There is an ethical duty to adopt various protective measures for the child population, and doctors are considered as decisive actors to help overcome this war. The vaccination rates among doctors and children are very meager, generating a lot of discussion about the implementation of compulsory vaccination for both groups. Thus, medical ethics and bioethics point out some ways for medical professionals to recognize the imperative need for self-vaccination and their patients’ sensitization to vaccination, supporting the persuasion of their colleagues and patients. Moreover, the ethical/bioethi-cal principles of the physician’s highest duty to protect the society are anchored in benefi- cence, not maleficence and justice, and they surpass the autonomy right to vaccine refusal. Also, it is expected that the development and dissemination of altruistic ethical values by the physicians can give significant support in the conquest of the “common good.”","PeriodicalId":380575,"journal":{"name":"Reflections on Bioethics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflections on Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vaccines are one of the most significant discoveries of humanity and are responsible for saving millions of lives around the world. However, their unquestionable successes are criticized and lead to the refusal of parents to vaccinate their children, which causes severe public health problems. There is an ethical duty to adopt various protective measures for the child population, and doctors are considered as decisive actors to help overcome this war. The vaccination rates among doctors and children are very meager, generating a lot of discussion about the implementation of compulsory vaccination for both groups. Thus, medical ethics and bioethics point out some ways for medical professionals to recognize the imperative need for self-vaccination and their patients’ sensitization to vaccination, supporting the persuasion of their colleagues and patients. Moreover, the ethical/bioethi-cal principles of the physician’s highest duty to protect the society are anchored in benefi- cence, not maleficence and justice, and they surpass the autonomy right to vaccine refusal. Also, it is expected that the development and dissemination of altruistic ethical values by the physicians can give significant support in the conquest of the “common good.”
医生加强自身免疫和儿童疫苗接种的伦理责任
疫苗是人类最重要的发现之一,拯救了全世界数百万人的生命。然而,他们毫无疑问的成功受到了批评,并导致父母拒绝给孩子接种疫苗,这造成了严重的公共卫生问题。对儿童采取各种保护措施是一种道德责任,医生被认为是帮助战胜这场战争的决定性角色。医生和儿童的疫苗接种率非常低,这引发了很多关于对这两个群体实施强制疫苗接种的讨论。因此,医学伦理学和生命伦理学为医学专业人员指出了一些方法,使他们认识到自我接种疫苗的必要性和患者对疫苗接种的敏感性,支持他们的同事和患者的说服。此外,医生保护社会的最高义务的伦理/生物伦理原则以造福而不是恶意和正义为基础,它们超越了拒绝接种疫苗的自主权。同时,我们也期望医生们对利他主义伦理价值观的发展和传播能够对“共同利益”的征服提供重要的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信