Studi Komparasi Model Pembelajaran Projek Based Learning (PjBL) dan Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS SDN 2 Abepura

Chelsi Yuliana S
{"title":"Studi Komparasi Model Pembelajaran Projek Based Learning (PjBL) dan Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS SDN 2 Abepura","authors":"Chelsi Yuliana S","doi":"10.37329/cetta.v6i2.2495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning outcomes are one level of measurement of learning objectives for students which are called Learning Outcomes. that way the delivery of learning material requires modification or appropriate learning design to achieve the objectives of teaching. The fact is that at SDN 2 Abepura there are still teachers who teach using conventional methods. This study aims to determine higher learning outcomes than the PjBL and Jigsaw learning models. The study used a quasi-experimental approach with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. calculated using the Gaint Score with 1) Social Studies learning outcomes for Hindu Buddhist kingdoms using the Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model are higher with an average of 0.65 than using the Jigsaw learning model 0.42 2). Social studies learning outcomes with Hindu Buddhist kingdom material in the aspects of applying, analyzing, evaluating, creating with the Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model are higher than the Jigsaw learning model. After following this research it can be concluded that the PjBL learning model has higher learning outcomes compared to the Jigsaw model.","PeriodicalId":237101,"journal":{"name":"Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","volume":"140 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v6i2.2495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning outcomes are one level of measurement of learning objectives for students which are called Learning Outcomes. that way the delivery of learning material requires modification or appropriate learning design to achieve the objectives of teaching. The fact is that at SDN 2 Abepura there are still teachers who teach using conventional methods. This study aims to determine higher learning outcomes than the PjBL and Jigsaw learning models. The study used a quasi-experimental approach with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. calculated using the Gaint Score with 1) Social Studies learning outcomes for Hindu Buddhist kingdoms using the Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model are higher with an average of 0.65 than using the Jigsaw learning model 0.42 2). Social studies learning outcomes with Hindu Buddhist kingdom material in the aspects of applying, analyzing, evaluating, creating with the Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model are higher than the Jigsaw learning model. After following this research it can be concluded that the PjBL learning model has higher learning outcomes compared to the Jigsaw model.
学习成果是衡量学生学习目标的一个层面,称为学习成果。这样,学习材料的传递需要修改或适当的学习设计来达到教学目标。事实是,在SDN 2 Abepura,仍然有教师使用传统的教学方法。本研究旨在确定比PjBL和拼图学习模型更高的学习效果。本研究采用准实验方法,采用前测后测非等效对照组设计。1)使用基于项目学习(PjBL)学习模型的印度佛教王国的社会研究学习成果平均为0.65,高于使用拼图学习模型的0.42(2)。使用基于项目学习(PjBL)学习模型的印度佛教王国的社会研究学习成果在应用、分析、评估和创造方面高于使用拼图学习模型。通过本研究,我们可以得出结论,PjBL学习模式比拼图学习模式具有更高的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信