The affect of battery pack technology and size choices on hybrid electric vehicle performance and fuel economy

R.C. Balch, A. Burke, A. Frank
{"title":"The affect of battery pack technology and size choices on hybrid electric vehicle performance and fuel economy","authors":"R.C. Balch, A. Burke, A. Frank","doi":"10.1109/BCAA.2001.905096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a comparative study of three hybrid-electric vehicles, three powertrains per vehicle and three battery technologies to determine the optimum configuration required to maximize fuel economy and vehicle performance. The qualitative analysis discusses various design decisions and sets forth the advantages and disadvantages associated with different hybrid configurations. Numerous computer modeling simulations are performed to investigate the various aspects of the hybrid vehicle design. The simulations generated vehicle performance results including urban and highway fuel economy and acceleration times. Results indicate that nickel metal hydride and lithium ion batteries provide optimum performance. Lithium ion technology is slightly better in the small battery pack charge sustaining hybrid (PO) options and for the SUV. Nickel metal hydride is the best battery choice of charge depleting hybrids with 20 and 60 miles of all electric range (P20, P60) for small and midsize cars. The general trend seen is that vehicles with larger battery packs perform better and are more efficient. In short, the parallel hybrid-electric is a true interim vehicle, on the road to true zero emissions, that appears to be capable of satisfying the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles consortium (PNGV) and the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) LEV II requirements.","PeriodicalId":360008,"journal":{"name":"Sixteenth Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances. Proceedings of the Conference (Cat. No.01TH8533)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixteenth Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances. Proceedings of the Conference (Cat. No.01TH8533)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BCAA.2001.905096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

This paper is a comparative study of three hybrid-electric vehicles, three powertrains per vehicle and three battery technologies to determine the optimum configuration required to maximize fuel economy and vehicle performance. The qualitative analysis discusses various design decisions and sets forth the advantages and disadvantages associated with different hybrid configurations. Numerous computer modeling simulations are performed to investigate the various aspects of the hybrid vehicle design. The simulations generated vehicle performance results including urban and highway fuel economy and acceleration times. Results indicate that nickel metal hydride and lithium ion batteries provide optimum performance. Lithium ion technology is slightly better in the small battery pack charge sustaining hybrid (PO) options and for the SUV. Nickel metal hydride is the best battery choice of charge depleting hybrids with 20 and 60 miles of all electric range (P20, P60) for small and midsize cars. The general trend seen is that vehicles with larger battery packs perform better and are more efficient. In short, the parallel hybrid-electric is a true interim vehicle, on the road to true zero emissions, that appears to be capable of satisfying the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles consortium (PNGV) and the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) LEV II requirements.
电池组技术和尺寸选择对混合动力汽车性能和燃油经济性的影响
本文对三种混合动力汽车、三种动力系统和三种电池技术进行了比较研究,以确定最大限度地提高燃油经济性和车辆性能所需的最佳配置。定性分析讨论了各种设计决策,并阐述了与不同混合结构相关的优缺点。进行了大量的计算机建模仿真,以研究混合动力汽车设计的各个方面。模拟产生的车辆性能结果包括城市和高速公路的燃油经济性和加速时间。结果表明,镍氢电池和锂离子电池性能最佳。锂离子技术在小型电池组充电维持混合动力(PO)选项和SUV中稍好一些。镍氢电池是小型和中型汽车全电动续航里程分别为20和60英里(P20和P60)的耗电混合动力车的最佳选择。总的趋势是,拥有更大电池组的汽车性能更好,效率更高。简而言之,并联混合动力电动汽车是一种真正的过渡汽车,在通往真正零排放的道路上,它似乎能够满足新一代汽车联盟(PNGV)和加州空气资源委员会(CARB)的LEV II要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信