교육감과 관련한 일본의 지방교육자치제도에 대한 연구

Jong-Ryeol Park, Sang- Ouk Noe
{"title":"교육감과 관련한 일본의 지방교육자치제도에 대한 연구","authors":"Jong-Ryeol Park, Sang- Ouk Noe","doi":"10.48033/jss.8.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to identify the problems with the education autonomy system and conflicts of the Japan, which is implementing the local education autonomy system to find a way to resolve conflicts and disputes that occur between the Minister of Education and the educational superintendent., and to suggest reasonable improvements. In Japan, as in Korea, there are conflicts and disputes between the central government and local governments. However, what is different from us is that the autonomy of local governments has been strengthened following the decentralization reform promoted by Japan in the 1990s. The Local Autonomy Act restricts the central government's involvement with local governments, and requires its intervention to meet the specified requirements and to follow due process, detailed in the relevant laws. In other words, the case of Japan, where there is a legal regulation making the central government not restricting or interfering autonomy of local governments, suggests that more detailed regulations are required within the scope that the government’s involvement and intervention doesn’t undermine the autonomy of local governments to us, where the requirements and process of the central governments’ intervention in local governments are simplified. In Korea, similar to the National and Local Dispute Resolution Committee in Japan, an administrative consultation and mediation committee exists under Article 168, but it is ineffective because there are insufficient regulations on the authority of the committee and the effect of the decision of the committee on the central and local governments. It is necessary to prepare a new type of dispute mediation body and related regulations that can minimize the loss that may occur in case of a dispute or conflict through comparative review of dispute mediation bodies in Korea and Japan.","PeriodicalId":236324,"journal":{"name":"The K Association of Education Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The K Association of Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48033/jss.8.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the problems with the education autonomy system and conflicts of the Japan, which is implementing the local education autonomy system to find a way to resolve conflicts and disputes that occur between the Minister of Education and the educational superintendent., and to suggest reasonable improvements. In Japan, as in Korea, there are conflicts and disputes between the central government and local governments. However, what is different from us is that the autonomy of local governments has been strengthened following the decentralization reform promoted by Japan in the 1990s. The Local Autonomy Act restricts the central government's involvement with local governments, and requires its intervention to meet the specified requirements and to follow due process, detailed in the relevant laws. In other words, the case of Japan, where there is a legal regulation making the central government not restricting or interfering autonomy of local governments, suggests that more detailed regulations are required within the scope that the government’s involvement and intervention doesn’t undermine the autonomy of local governments to us, where the requirements and process of the central governments’ intervention in local governments are simplified. In Korea, similar to the National and Local Dispute Resolution Committee in Japan, an administrative consultation and mediation committee exists under Article 168, but it is ineffective because there are insufficient regulations on the authority of the committee and the effect of the decision of the committee on the central and local governments. It is necessary to prepare a new type of dispute mediation body and related regulations that can minimize the loss that may occur in case of a dispute or conflict through comparative review of dispute mediation bodies in Korea and Japan.
与教育监相关的日本地方教育自治制度研究
本研究的目的在于找出正在实行地方教育自治制度的日本在教育自治制度中存在的问题和矛盾,寻找解决教育部长与教育监之间矛盾和纠纷的方法。,并提出合理的改进建议。与韩国一样,日本也存在中央政府和地方自治团体之间的矛盾和纷争。但与我们不同的是,日本在上世纪90年代推行的地方分权改革之后,地方自治得到了加强。《地方自治法》限制了中央政府对地方政府的干预,要求中央政府的干预必须符合规定的要求,并遵循相关法律规定的正当程序。换句话说,日本的案例中有一条规定中央政府不限制或干涉地方自治的法律规定,这意味着在政府的介入和干预不损害地方自治的范围内,对我们来说需要更详细的规定,从而简化了中央政府干预地方政府的要求和程序。韩国也像日本一样,根据《宪法》第168条设立了行政协商调解委员会,但由于对委员会的权限和委员会的决定对中央和地方自治团体的影响的规定不足,因此没有发挥作用。有必要通过对韩国和日本的纠纷调解机构的比较研究,制定一种新的纠纷调解机构和相关规定,以便在发生纠纷或冲突时将损失降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信