Requirement of Postoperative Ventilation and analgesics during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) surgery – A Comparison between Combined High Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia (HTEA) with GA and GA Alone

S. Azad, A. Beg
{"title":"Requirement of Postoperative Ventilation and analgesics during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) surgery – A Comparison between Combined High Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia (HTEA) with GA and GA Alone","authors":"S. Azad, A. Beg","doi":"10.3329/bhj.v36i2.56032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beckground: This is often difficult to achieve optimal pain relief after coronary artery bypass surgery and also great challenge to choice appropriate analgesics with minimize the duration of mechanical ventilation. In the postoperative period inadequate analgesia may increase morbidity by causing adverse haemodynamic, metabolic, immunologic and haemostatic attentions and prolong mechanical ventilation with more ICU stay. High Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia (HTEA) as an adjunct to general anaesthesia has been shown to be potentially beneficial in postoperative pain relief and the requirement of mechanical ventilationin patients with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB). HTEA provides good protection from stress response, ensures hemodynamic stability, improves distribution of coronary blood flow with reducing demand of oxygen, less requirement of postoperative analgesia , mechanical ventilation and ICU stay.\nObjective: This study has been undertaken with a view to compare requirement of postoperative mechanical ventilation and analgesics in OPCAB surgery between HTEA with GA and GA alone.\nMethods: This prospective, randomized case control comparative study was carried out in sixty patients without having left main coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction <30% or contraindication of regional anaesthesia scheduled for OPCAB. They were divided into two groups, thirty in each group. Group A received GA alone and group B received high thoracic epidural anaesthesia with GA. Requirement of postoperative analgesics, pain score, consciousness score, sedation score, satisfection level and duration of ventilation with length of stay in intensive care unit were recorded in the post-operative period.\nResults: Rescue analgesics received and found 16(53.3%) and 6(20.0%) needed analgesia in group A and group B respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Regarding the pain score (VAS) during maintenance with ventilator with awareness at first fourth hour significant (p<0.05) change between two groups. After extubation at rest in different time interval and found significant (p<0.05) change between two groups in all follow-up times. Post-operative pain score (VAS) after extubation at movement in different time interval and found significant (p<0.05) change between two groups. Post-operative pain score (VAS) after extubation at during coughing in different time interval and found significant (p<0.05) change between two groups. Post-operative sedation score at first six hour (hourly) and found significant (p<0.05) change between two groups except 1st hour, which was not significant (p>0.05). The mean extubation hours were 7.4±1.09 hours in group A and 5.3±0.81 hours in group B. The mean ICU stay was 72.9±9.2 hours in group A and 57.1±12.0 hours in group B and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) in unpaired t-test. No postoperative complication was observed in both groups.\nConclusion: HTEA with GA appeared to be most reliable postoperative pain relief, shorter mechanical ventilation, ICU stay in OPCAB surgery\nBangladesh Heart Journal 2021; 36(2): 74-81","PeriodicalId":247590,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v36i2.56032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Beckground: This is often difficult to achieve optimal pain relief after coronary artery bypass surgery and also great challenge to choice appropriate analgesics with minimize the duration of mechanical ventilation. In the postoperative period inadequate analgesia may increase morbidity by causing adverse haemodynamic, metabolic, immunologic and haemostatic attentions and prolong mechanical ventilation with more ICU stay. High Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia (HTEA) as an adjunct to general anaesthesia has been shown to be potentially beneficial in postoperative pain relief and the requirement of mechanical ventilationin patients with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB). HTEA provides good protection from stress response, ensures hemodynamic stability, improves distribution of coronary blood flow with reducing demand of oxygen, less requirement of postoperative analgesia , mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. Objective: This study has been undertaken with a view to compare requirement of postoperative mechanical ventilation and analgesics in OPCAB surgery between HTEA with GA and GA alone. Methods: This prospective, randomized case control comparative study was carried out in sixty patients without having left main coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction <30% or contraindication of regional anaesthesia scheduled for OPCAB. They were divided into two groups, thirty in each group. Group A received GA alone and group B received high thoracic epidural anaesthesia with GA. Requirement of postoperative analgesics, pain score, consciousness score, sedation score, satisfection level and duration of ventilation with length of stay in intensive care unit were recorded in the post-operative period. Results: Rescue analgesics received and found 16(53.3%) and 6(20.0%) needed analgesia in group A and group B respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Regarding the pain score (VAS) during maintenance with ventilator with awareness at first fourth hour significant (p<0.05) change between two groups. After extubation at rest in different time interval and found significant (p<0.05) change between two groups in all follow-up times. Post-operative pain score (VAS) after extubation at movement in different time interval and found significant (p<0.05) change between two groups. Post-operative pain score (VAS) after extubation at during coughing in different time interval and found significant (p<0.05) change between two groups. Post-operative sedation score at first six hour (hourly) and found significant (p<0.05) change between two groups except 1st hour, which was not significant (p>0.05). The mean extubation hours were 7.4±1.09 hours in group A and 5.3±0.81 hours in group B. The mean ICU stay was 72.9±9.2 hours in group A and 57.1±12.0 hours in group B and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) in unpaired t-test. No postoperative complication was observed in both groups. Conclusion: HTEA with GA appeared to be most reliable postoperative pain relief, shorter mechanical ventilation, ICU stay in OPCAB surgery Bangladesh Heart Journal 2021; 36(2): 74-81
非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)术后对通气和镇痛的要求——胸廓高位硬膜外麻醉(HTEA)联合GA与单独GA的比较
贝克地:冠状动脉搭桥术后通常很难达到最佳的疼痛缓解,选择合适的镇痛药并尽量减少机械通气时间也是一个很大的挑战。术后不适当的镇痛可引起不良的血流动力学、代谢、免疫和止血反应,延长机械通气时间,延长ICU住院时间,从而增加发病率。高胸段硬膜外麻醉(HTEA)作为全身麻醉的辅助,已被证明对非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术(OPCAB)患者术后疼痛缓解和机械通气需求有潜在的益处。HTEA对应激反应具有良好的保护作用,保证了血流动力学的稳定性,改善了冠状动脉血流分布,减少了供氧需求,减少了术后镇痛、机械通气和ICU住院时间。目的:比较HTEA联合GA与单独GA对OPCAB术后机械通气和镇痛药物的需求。方法:对60例无左主干冠状动脉疾病(左室射血分数0.05)的患者进行前瞻性、随机病例对照研究。A组平均拔管时间为7.4±1.09小时,B组平均拔管时间为5.3±0.81小时,A组平均ICU停留时间为72.9±9.2小时,B组平均ICU停留时间为57.1±12.0小时,非配对t检验差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。两组均无术后并发症。结论:在OPCAB手术中,HTEA联合GA似乎是最可靠的术后疼痛缓解,缩短了机械通气时间,缩短了ICU住院时间。36 (2): 74 - 81
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信