Evaluation of the Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals Towards Using Evidence-Based Medicine Software in the Health Care Settings

Abdelbaset M. Elghriani, R. M. Saad, Abdelsalam M. Maatuk
{"title":"Evaluation of the Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals Towards Using Evidence-Based Medicine Software in the Health Care Settings","authors":"Abdelbaset M. Elghriani, R. M. Saad, Abdelsalam M. Maatuk","doi":"10.1109/ICEMIS56295.2022.9914364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problems of excess paperwork, delays in approving services, arguments, and claims of over-servicing may arise during healthcare settings. This is perceived as unwanted for patients and health care professionals and costly to the health care system. Introducing an Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) decision software in health systems could provide a partial solution, by reducing doubt about effective treatment, undue procedures, and improving the service. This study aims to investigate the attitudes of health care professionals to the possible implementation of EBM software tools in the health care system. A quantitative study has been conducted that has consisted of a questionnaire asking about self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and behavior to EBM in general. The contributors were health care professionals from different medical specialties. The contributors who had accomplished the questionnaire (n=100) indicated that they were knowledgeable about the evidence base in their field but perceived some difficulties when practicing EBM. Overall, the contributors are supportive of EBM, however have strong concerns about the implementation of the EBM software for decision making in the health care systems. The contributors felt that EBM tools should not be applied strictly and should take into account clinical judgment and patient variability and preferences","PeriodicalId":191284,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMIS56295.2022.9914364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problems of excess paperwork, delays in approving services, arguments, and claims of over-servicing may arise during healthcare settings. This is perceived as unwanted for patients and health care professionals and costly to the health care system. Introducing an Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) decision software in health systems could provide a partial solution, by reducing doubt about effective treatment, undue procedures, and improving the service. This study aims to investigate the attitudes of health care professionals to the possible implementation of EBM software tools in the health care system. A quantitative study has been conducted that has consisted of a questionnaire asking about self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and behavior to EBM in general. The contributors were health care professionals from different medical specialties. The contributors who had accomplished the questionnaire (n=100) indicated that they were knowledgeable about the evidence base in their field but perceived some difficulties when practicing EBM. Overall, the contributors are supportive of EBM, however have strong concerns about the implementation of the EBM software for decision making in the health care systems. The contributors felt that EBM tools should not be applied strictly and should take into account clinical judgment and patient variability and preferences
卫生保健专业人员对在卫生保健机构中使用循证医学软件的态度评价
在医疗保健环境中,可能会出现文书工作过多、批准服务延迟、争论和服务过度索赔等问题。这被认为对病人和卫生保健专业人员来说是不需要的,对卫生保健系统来说是昂贵的。在卫生系统中引入循证医学(EBM)决策软件可以通过减少对有效治疗、不当程序的怀疑和改善服务提供部分解决方案。本研究旨在调查医疗保健专业人员对在医疗保健系统中可能实施EBM软件工具的态度。一项定量研究已经进行,包括一份问卷,询问自我报告的知识,态度,以及对循证医学的行为。捐助者是来自不同医学专业的保健专业人员。完成问卷调查的参与者(n=100)表示,他们对所在领域的证据基础有所了解,但在实践循证医学时感到一些困难。总体而言,作者支持循证医学,但对在医疗保健系统中实施循证医学软件进行决策有强烈的担忧。作者认为EBM工具不应严格应用,而应考虑到临床判断和患者的可变性和偏好
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信