Do Hospital Rankings Mislead Patients? Variability Among National Rating Systems for Orthopaedic Surgery.

R. Shah, D. Manning, B. Butler, K. Bilimoria
{"title":"Do Hospital Rankings Mislead Patients? Variability Among National Rating Systems for Orthopaedic Surgery.","authors":"R. Shah, D. Manning, B. Butler, K. Bilimoria","doi":"10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nA growing number of online hospital rating systems for orthopaedic surgery are found. Although the accuracy and consistency of these systems have been questioned in other fields of medicine, no formal analysis of these systems in orthopaedics has been found.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFive hospital rating systems (US News, HealthGrades, CareChex, Women's Choice, and Hospital Compare) were examined which designate \"high-performing\" and \"low-performing\" hospitals for orthopaedic surgery. Descriptive analysis was conducted for all hospitals defined as high- or low-performing in any of the five rating systems, and assessment for agreement/disagreement between ratings was done. A subsample of hospitals ranked by all systems was then created, and agreement between rating systems was investigated using a Cohen's kappa. Each hospital was included in a multinomial logistic regression model investigating which hospital characteristics increased the odds of being favorably/unfavorably rated by each system.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOne thousand six hundred forty hospitals were evaluated by every rating system. Six hundred thirty-eight unique hospitals were identified as high-performing by at least 1 rating system; however, no hospital was ranked as high-performing by all five rating systems. Four hundred fifty-two unique hospitals were identified as low-performing; however, no hospital was ranked as low-performing by all the three rating systems which define low-performing hospitals. Within the study subsample of hospitals evaluated by each system, little agreement between any combination of rating systems (κ < 0.10) regarding top-tier or bottom-tier performance was found. It was more likely for a hospital to be considered high-performing by one system and low-performing by another (10.66%) than for the majority of the five rating systems to consider a hospital high-performing (3.76%).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nLittle agreement between hospital quality rating systems for orthopaedic surgery is found. Publicly available hospital ratings for performance in orthopaedic surgery offer conflicting results and provide little guidance to patients, providers, or payers when selecting a hospital for orthopaedic surgery.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nLevel 1 economic study.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"06 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

INTRODUCTION A growing number of online hospital rating systems for orthopaedic surgery are found. Although the accuracy and consistency of these systems have been questioned in other fields of medicine, no formal analysis of these systems in orthopaedics has been found. METHODS Five hospital rating systems (US News, HealthGrades, CareChex, Women's Choice, and Hospital Compare) were examined which designate "high-performing" and "low-performing" hospitals for orthopaedic surgery. Descriptive analysis was conducted for all hospitals defined as high- or low-performing in any of the five rating systems, and assessment for agreement/disagreement between ratings was done. A subsample of hospitals ranked by all systems was then created, and agreement between rating systems was investigated using a Cohen's kappa. Each hospital was included in a multinomial logistic regression model investigating which hospital characteristics increased the odds of being favorably/unfavorably rated by each system. RESULTS One thousand six hundred forty hospitals were evaluated by every rating system. Six hundred thirty-eight unique hospitals were identified as high-performing by at least 1 rating system; however, no hospital was ranked as high-performing by all five rating systems. Four hundred fifty-two unique hospitals were identified as low-performing; however, no hospital was ranked as low-performing by all the three rating systems which define low-performing hospitals. Within the study subsample of hospitals evaluated by each system, little agreement between any combination of rating systems (κ < 0.10) regarding top-tier or bottom-tier performance was found. It was more likely for a hospital to be considered high-performing by one system and low-performing by another (10.66%) than for the majority of the five rating systems to consider a hospital high-performing (3.76%). CONCLUSION Little agreement between hospital quality rating systems for orthopaedic surgery is found. Publicly available hospital ratings for performance in orthopaedic surgery offer conflicting results and provide little guidance to patients, providers, or payers when selecting a hospital for orthopaedic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 1 economic study.
医院排名会误导患者吗?国家骨科手术分级系统的差异。
越来越多的骨科手术在线医院评级系统被发现。尽管这些系统的准确性和一致性在其他医学领域受到质疑,但尚未发现这些系统在骨科中的正式分析。方法对5个医院评级系统(US News、HealthGrades、CareChex、Women’s Choice和hospital Compare)进行研究,这些系统指定了骨科手术的“高绩效”和“低绩效”医院。对所有在五个评级系统中被定义为高绩效或低绩效的医院进行描述性分析,并对评级之间的一致/不一致进行评估。然后创建所有系统排名的医院子样本,并使用科恩kappa调查评级系统之间的一致性。每个医院都被包括在一个多项逻辑回归模型中,调查哪些医院特征增加了每个系统对其有利/不利评价的几率。结果采用各评价体系对1440家医院进行了评价。638家独特的医院被至少一种评级系统认定为高绩效医院;然而,没有一家医院在所有五个评级系统中都名列前茅。452家独特的医院被认定为低绩效医院;然而,没有一家医院被所有三个定义低绩效医院的评级系统评为低绩效医院。在每个系统评估的医院的研究子样本中,发现评级系统(κ < 0.10)的任何组合之间关于顶级或底层绩效的一致性很小。一家医院在一个系统中被认为是高绩效的,在另一个系统中被认为是低绩效的(10.66%),而在五个评级系统中,大多数被认为是高绩效的(3.76%)。结论骨科各医院质量评价体系之间的一致性不大。公开获得的医院骨科手术表现评级提供了相互矛盾的结果,并且在选择骨科手术医院时对患者、提供者或付款人提供了很少的指导。证据水平:1级经济研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信