A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science

S. Leible, Steffen Schlager, M. Schubotz, Bela Gipp
{"title":"A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science","authors":"S. Leible, Steffen Schlager, M. Schubotz, Bela Gipp","doi":"10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many sectors, like finance, medicine, manufacturing, and education, use blockchain applications to profit from the unique bundle of characteristics of this technology. Blockchain technology (BT) promises benefits in trustability, collaboration, organization, identification, credibility, and transparency. In this paper, we conduct an analysis in which we show how open science can benefit from this technology and its properties. For this, we determined the requirements of an open science ecosystem and compared them with the characteristics of BT to prove that the technology suits as an infrastructure. We also review literature and promising blockchain-based projects for open science to describe the current research situation. To this end, we examine the projects in particular for their relevance and contribution to open science and categorize them afterwards according to their primary purpose. Several of them already provide functionalities that can have a positive impact on current research workflows. So, BT offers promising possibilities for its use in science, but why is it then not used on a large-scale in that area? To answer this question, we point out various shortcomings, challenges, unanswered questions, and research potentials that we found in the literature and identified during our analysis. These topics shall serve as starting points for future research to foster the BT for open science and beyond, especially in the long-term.","PeriodicalId":158641,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers Blockchain","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers Blockchain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

Many sectors, like finance, medicine, manufacturing, and education, use blockchain applications to profit from the unique bundle of characteristics of this technology. Blockchain technology (BT) promises benefits in trustability, collaboration, organization, identification, credibility, and transparency. In this paper, we conduct an analysis in which we show how open science can benefit from this technology and its properties. For this, we determined the requirements of an open science ecosystem and compared them with the characteristics of BT to prove that the technology suits as an infrastructure. We also review literature and promising blockchain-based projects for open science to describe the current research situation. To this end, we examine the projects in particular for their relevance and contribution to open science and categorize them afterwards according to their primary purpose. Several of them already provide functionalities that can have a positive impact on current research workflows. So, BT offers promising possibilities for its use in science, but why is it then not used on a large-scale in that area? To answer this question, we point out various shortcomings, challenges, unanswered questions, and research potentials that we found in the literature and identified during our analysis. These topics shall serve as starting points for future research to foster the BT for open science and beyond, especially in the long-term.
区块链技术与区块链项目促进开放科学发展综述
许多行业,如金融、医药、制造业和教育,都使用区块链应用程序从这项技术的独特特征中获利。区块链技术(BT)承诺在信任、协作、组织、识别、可信度和透明度方面带来好处。在本文中,我们进行了一项分析,其中我们展示了开放科学如何从这项技术及其特性中受益。为此,我们确定了开放科学生态系统的要求,并将其与BT的特征进行了比较,以证明该技术适合作为基础设施。我们还回顾了开放科学的文献和有前途的基于区块链的项目,以描述当前的研究情况。为此,我们特别研究了这些项目的相关性和对开放科学的贡献,并根据它们的主要目的对它们进行了分类。其中一些已经提供了可以对当前研究工作流程产生积极影响的功能。因此,BT为其在科学领域的应用提供了有希望的可能性,但为什么它没有在该领域大规模使用?为了回答这个问题,我们指出了我们在文献中发现并在分析过程中确定的各种缺点、挑战、未解决的问题和研究潜力。这些主题应作为未来研究的起点,以促进开放科学及其他领域的BT,特别是从长远来看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信