Comparison of two classification methods for Musical Instrument identification

Y. Takahashi, K. Kondo
{"title":"Comparison of two classification methods for Musical Instrument identification","authors":"Y. Takahashi, K. Kondo","doi":"10.1109/GCCE.2014.7031196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compared the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) with Random Forest (RF) for musical instrument identification from clips with a mixture of instruments. As the first step, monotone samples from the Musical Instrument Samples (Univ. Iowa) and RWC Music Database were used to identify the individual instruments. For the Iowa monotones, an overall instrument recognition rate of 24.8% and 82.1% was obtained using LDA and RF, respectively. However, the rate degrades to 54.9% on the RWC monotones even with RF, most likely due to insufficient number of features to cover the increase in variability of this large database.","PeriodicalId":145771,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 3rd Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 3rd Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GCCE.2014.7031196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper, we compared the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) with Random Forest (RF) for musical instrument identification from clips with a mixture of instruments. As the first step, monotone samples from the Musical Instrument Samples (Univ. Iowa) and RWC Music Database were used to identify the individual instruments. For the Iowa monotones, an overall instrument recognition rate of 24.8% and 82.1% was obtained using LDA and RF, respectively. However, the rate degrades to 54.9% on the RWC monotones even with RF, most likely due to insufficient number of features to cover the increase in variability of this large database.
两种乐器鉴定分类方法的比较
在本文中,我们比较了线性判别分析(LDA)和随机森林(RF)在乐器混合剪辑中的乐器识别。作为第一步,来自乐器样本(Univ. Iowa)和RWC音乐数据库的单调样本被用来识别单个乐器。对于爱荷华单调谱,LDA和RF的总体识别率分别为24.8%和82.1%。然而,即使使用RF,在RWC单调上,该比率也下降到54.9%,这很可能是由于特征数量不足,无法覆盖这个大型数据库的可变性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信