Artificial Intelligence and Discretionary Decisions. The Triumph or Loss of Commander Pirx?

Łukasz Dubiński
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Discretionary Decisions. The Triumph or Loss of Commander Pirx?","authors":"Łukasz Dubiński","doi":"10.14746/ppuam.2021.13.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the considerations is to determine whether artificial intelligence units can take the place of humans in administrative proceedings ending with the issuance of discretionary decisions. The author starts from presenting the essence of discretionary decisions and guide the scope of judicial control over them. The presented considerations relate primarily to the potential placement of such devices in the “administrative justice system” that can be defined as artificial intelligence units in the strict sense. Therefore, this concerns devices for which human intervention is usually limited to switching on and technical supervision. However, the considerations can also be applied to such devices where human interference in their operation is slightly greater. It should be emphasized, however, that it this does not concern devices that are fully or almost fully controlled by humans.","PeriodicalId":108326,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2021.13.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the considerations is to determine whether artificial intelligence units can take the place of humans in administrative proceedings ending with the issuance of discretionary decisions. The author starts from presenting the essence of discretionary decisions and guide the scope of judicial control over them. The presented considerations relate primarily to the potential placement of such devices in the “administrative justice system” that can be defined as artificial intelligence units in the strict sense. Therefore, this concerns devices for which human intervention is usually limited to switching on and technical supervision. However, the considerations can also be applied to such devices where human interference in their operation is slightly greater. It should be emphasized, however, that it this does not concern devices that are fully or almost fully controlled by humans.
人工智能与自由裁量决策。皮尔克斯指挥官的胜利还是失败?
考虑的目的是确定人工智能单位是否可以在以发布酌情决定结束的行政诉讼中取代人类。笔者从自由裁量决定的本质出发,对自由裁量决定的司法控制范围进行了指导。所提出的考虑主要涉及在严格意义上可定义为人工智能单元的“行政司法系统”中放置这种装置的可能性。因此,这涉及到人为干预通常仅限于开关和技术监督的设备。然而,这些考虑因素也可以应用于这些设备,其中人为干扰在其操作中略大。然而,应该强调的是,这并不涉及完全或几乎完全由人类控制的设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信