Optimal Environmental Targeting in the Amazon Rainforest

J. Assunção, R. Mcmillan, Joshua Murphy, Eduardo Souza-Rodrigues
{"title":"Optimal Environmental Targeting in the Amazon Rainforest","authors":"J. Assunção, R. Mcmillan, Joshua Murphy, Eduardo Souza-Rodrigues","doi":"10.3386/W25636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper sets out a data-driven approach for targeting environmental policies optimally in order to combat deforestation. We focus on the Amazon, the world’s most extensive rainforest, where Brazil’s federal government issued a ‘Priority List’ of municipalities in 2008 – a blacklist to be targeted with more intense environmental monitoring and enforcement. First, we estimate the causal impact of the Priority List on deforestation (along with other relevant treatment effects) using ‘changes-in-changes’ (Athey and Imbens, 2006), finding that it reduced deforestation by 43 percent and cut emissions by almost 50 million tons of carbon. Second, we develop a novel framework for computing targeted optimal blacklists that draws on our treatment effect estimates, assigning municipalities to a counterfactual list that minimizes total deforestation subject to realistic resource constraints. We show that the ex-post optimal list would result in carbon emissions over 10 percent lower than the actual list, amounting to savings of more than $1.2 billion (34% of the total value of the Priority List), with emissions over 23 percent lower on average than a randomly selected list. The approach we propose is relevant both for assessing targeted counterfactual policies to reduce deforestation and for quantifying the impacts of policy targeting more generally.","PeriodicalId":403142,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Agriculture","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W25636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

This paper sets out a data-driven approach for targeting environmental policies optimally in order to combat deforestation. We focus on the Amazon, the world’s most extensive rainforest, where Brazil’s federal government issued a ‘Priority List’ of municipalities in 2008 – a blacklist to be targeted with more intense environmental monitoring and enforcement. First, we estimate the causal impact of the Priority List on deforestation (along with other relevant treatment effects) using ‘changes-in-changes’ (Athey and Imbens, 2006), finding that it reduced deforestation by 43 percent and cut emissions by almost 50 million tons of carbon. Second, we develop a novel framework for computing targeted optimal blacklists that draws on our treatment effect estimates, assigning municipalities to a counterfactual list that minimizes total deforestation subject to realistic resource constraints. We show that the ex-post optimal list would result in carbon emissions over 10 percent lower than the actual list, amounting to savings of more than $1.2 billion (34% of the total value of the Priority List), with emissions over 23 percent lower on average than a randomly selected list. The approach we propose is relevant both for assessing targeted counterfactual policies to reduce deforestation and for quantifying the impacts of policy targeting more generally.
亚马逊雨林的最佳环境目标
本文提出了一种数据驱动的方法,以最优地确定环境政策,以打击森林砍伐。我们关注的是亚马逊雨林,这是世界上面积最大的雨林,巴西联邦政府在2008年发布了一份城市“优先名单”,这是一份黑名单,将以更严格的环境监测和执法为目标。首先,我们使用“变化中的变化”(Athey和Imbens, 2006)估算了优先清单对森林砍伐的因果影响(以及其他相关的处理效果),发现它减少了43%的森林砍伐,减少了近5000万吨的碳排放。其次,我们开发了一个新的框架,用于计算有针对性的最佳黑名单,该黑名单利用我们的处理效果估计,将市政当局分配到一个反事实列表,该列表在现实资源约束下最大限度地减少森林砍伐总量。我们表明,事后最优清单将导致碳排放量比实际清单低10%以上,相当于节省超过12亿美元(占优先清单总价值的34%),排放量平均比随机选择的清单低23%以上。我们提出的方法既适用于评估有针对性的反事实政策以减少森林砍伐,也适用于更广泛地量化政策目标的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信