Mitigating the effect of linear infrastructure on arboreal mammals in dense forest: A canopy bridge trial

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Briony Mitchell, Lee Harrison, Joanne Ainley, Rodney van der Ree, Kylie Soanes
{"title":"Mitigating the effect of linear infrastructure on arboreal mammals in dense forest: A canopy bridge trial","authors":"Briony Mitchell,&nbsp;Lee Harrison,&nbsp;Joanne Ainley,&nbsp;Rodney van der Ree,&nbsp;Kylie Soanes","doi":"10.1111/emr.12568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Roads and other linear infrastructure create treeless gaps that can limit the movement of non-flying, arboreal animals. These negative effects are particularly strong in dense forests, where even narrow infrastructure corridors represent a significant change in habitat structure. Artificial canopy bridges are an increasingly common approach to mitigating the barrier effect of roads and other linear infrastructure on the movement of arboreal mammals; however, questions remain about the success of various designs for different species. Here we conduct an experimental evaluation of the response of a critically endangered possum, Leadbeater's Possum (<i>Gymnobelideus leadbeateri</i>), to two artificial canopy bridge designs: single-rope bridges and ladder bridges. We found that both bridges were used by Leadbeater's Possum and five other species of arboreal marsupial to cross narrow, forestry roads. However, Leadbeater's Possums crossed ladder bridges 13 times more often than the single-rope design (average of 564.5 and 41.75 crossings per design respectively). Radiotelemetry conducted on four Leadbeater's Possums prior to bridge installation detected no road crossings, providing preliminary evidence that the bridges improved cross-road movement. Ladder bridges appear to be the better design choice for a wider range of arboreal marsupials as they were used more frequently, offer greater stability, and provide better predator avoidance than single-rope designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 3","pages":"228-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12568","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roads and other linear infrastructure create treeless gaps that can limit the movement of non-flying, arboreal animals. These negative effects are particularly strong in dense forests, where even narrow infrastructure corridors represent a significant change in habitat structure. Artificial canopy bridges are an increasingly common approach to mitigating the barrier effect of roads and other linear infrastructure on the movement of arboreal mammals; however, questions remain about the success of various designs for different species. Here we conduct an experimental evaluation of the response of a critically endangered possum, Leadbeater's Possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri), to two artificial canopy bridge designs: single-rope bridges and ladder bridges. We found that both bridges were used by Leadbeater's Possum and five other species of arboreal marsupial to cross narrow, forestry roads. However, Leadbeater's Possums crossed ladder bridges 13 times more often than the single-rope design (average of 564.5 and 41.75 crossings per design respectively). Radiotelemetry conducted on four Leadbeater's Possums prior to bridge installation detected no road crossings, providing preliminary evidence that the bridges improved cross-road movement. Ladder bridges appear to be the better design choice for a wider range of arboreal marsupials as they were used more frequently, offer greater stability, and provide better predator avoidance than single-rope designs.

Abstract Image

减轻密集森林中线性基础设施对树栖哺乳动物的影响:树冠桥试验
道路和其他线性基础设施造成了没有树木的空隙,限制了不飞行的树栖动物的活动。这些负面影响在茂密的森林中尤其强烈,在茂密的森林中,即使狭窄的基础设施走廊也代表着生境结构的重大变化。人工树冠桥是一种越来越普遍的方法,以减轻道路和其他线性基础设施对树栖哺乳动物运动的障碍效应;然而,关于不同物种的不同设计是否成功的问题仍然存在。在这里,我们对一种极度濒危的负鼠Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri)对两种人工树冠桥设计的反应进行了实验评估:单绳桥和阶梯桥。我们发现,Leadbeater负鼠和其他五种树栖有袋动物都利用这两座桥穿过狭窄的森林道路。然而,Leadbeater的负鼠穿越阶梯桥的次数是单绳设计的13倍(平均每个设计分别为564.5次和41.75次)。在桥梁安装之前,对四只Leadbeater’s负鼠进行的无线电遥测没有检测到任何交叉路口,这为桥梁改善了交叉路口的移动提供了初步证据。梯子桥似乎是更广泛的树栖有袋动物更好的设计选择,因为它们使用更频繁,提供更大的稳定性,并且比单绳设计更好地避免捕食者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信