{"title":"The Grand Theory Is Alive: An Interview with Jonathan H. Turner","authors":"J. Turner, P. Jedlicka","doi":"10.46938/tv.2021.519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan H. Turner is the Distinguished Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Riverside and, for many decades, the world’s leading authority on sociological theory, with research interests in many other areas such as human and societal evolution, social stratification and inequality, philosophy of science, and historical sociology. Professor Turner has authored, co-authored, edited, or co-edited a number of works, including more than 43 influential books, which have been published in twelve different languages, including The Structure of Sociological Theory, The Emergence of Sociological Theory, and many others. He is a member of the American Sociological Association and a former president of the Pacific Sociological Society and the journal editor for Sociological Theory. Professor Turner received a B.A. with honors from University of California at Santa Barbara, a M.A. and a doctorate in sociology from Cornell University. The interview is Professor Turner’s critical reply to the arguments raised in the article “Against Grand Theories: A (Cautionary) Tale of Two Disciplines,” which presents the view that universally accepted grand theories in social sciences are not achievable because of the lack of a common methodology or a theoretical core which results in their multiparadigmatic nature, value-leadenness and insufficient objectivity. The interview took place on March 23, 2021 online.","PeriodicalId":349992,"journal":{"name":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2021.519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Jonathan H. Turner is the Distinguished Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Riverside and, for many decades, the world’s leading authority on sociological theory, with research interests in many other areas such as human and societal evolution, social stratification and inequality, philosophy of science, and historical sociology. Professor Turner has authored, co-authored, edited, or co-edited a number of works, including more than 43 influential books, which have been published in twelve different languages, including The Structure of Sociological Theory, The Emergence of Sociological Theory, and many others. He is a member of the American Sociological Association and a former president of the Pacific Sociological Society and the journal editor for Sociological Theory. Professor Turner received a B.A. with honors from University of California at Santa Barbara, a M.A. and a doctorate in sociology from Cornell University. The interview is Professor Turner’s critical reply to the arguments raised in the article “Against Grand Theories: A (Cautionary) Tale of Two Disciplines,” which presents the view that universally accepted grand theories in social sciences are not achievable because of the lack of a common methodology or a theoretical core which results in their multiparadigmatic nature, value-leadenness and insufficient objectivity. The interview took place on March 23, 2021 online.
乔纳森·h·特纳(Jonathan H. Turner)是加州大学河滨分校的杰出社会学教授,几十年来,他一直是世界上社会学理论的主要权威,研究领域包括人类和社会进化、社会分层和不平等、科学哲学和历史社会学。特纳教授撰写、合作撰写、编辑或合编了许多著作,包括超过43本有影响力的书籍,已以12种不同的语言出版,包括《社会学理论的结构》、《社会学理论的出现》等。他是美国社会学协会的成员,太平洋社会学学会的前任主席和《社会学理论》杂志的编辑。特纳教授获得加州大学圣巴巴拉分校(University of California at Santa Barbara)荣誉学士学位,康奈尔大学(Cornell University)社会学硕士学位和博士学位。这次采访是特纳教授对文章“反对大理论:两门学科的(警世)故事”中提出的论点的批判性回答,该文章提出了一种观点,即普遍接受的社会科学大理论是无法实现的,因为缺乏共同的方法论或理论核心,这导致了它们的多范式性、价值导向性和客观性不足。该采访于2021年3月23日在网上进行。