Daniel Garcia-Macia, Chang-tai Hsieh, Peter J. Klenow
{"title":"How Destructive is Innovation?","authors":"Daniel Garcia-Macia, Chang-tai Hsieh, Peter J. Klenow","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2896913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrants and incumbents can create new products and displace the products of competitors. Incumbents can also improve their existing products. How much of aggregate productivity growth occurs through each of these channels? Using data from the U.S. Longitudinal Business Database on all nonfarm private businesses from 1983 to 2013, we arrive at three main conclusions: First, most growth appears to come from incumbents. We infer this from the modest employment share of entering firms (defined as those less than 5 years old). Second, most growth seems to occur through improvements of existing varieties rather than creation of brand new varieties. Third, own‐product improvements by incumbents appear to be more important than creative destruction. We infer this because the distribution of job creation and destruction has thinner tails than implied by a model with a dominant role for creative destruction.","PeriodicalId":115451,"journal":{"name":"Kauffman: Large Research Projects - NBER (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"162","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kauffman: Large Research Projects - NBER (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2896913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 162
Abstract
Entrants and incumbents can create new products and displace the products of competitors. Incumbents can also improve their existing products. How much of aggregate productivity growth occurs through each of these channels? Using data from the U.S. Longitudinal Business Database on all nonfarm private businesses from 1983 to 2013, we arrive at three main conclusions: First, most growth appears to come from incumbents. We infer this from the modest employment share of entering firms (defined as those less than 5 years old). Second, most growth seems to occur through improvements of existing varieties rather than creation of brand new varieties. Third, own‐product improvements by incumbents appear to be more important than creative destruction. We infer this because the distribution of job creation and destruction has thinner tails than implied by a model with a dominant role for creative destruction.
进入者和在位者可以创造新产品并取代竞争对手的产品。现有企业还可以改进现有产品。总生产率增长有多少是通过这些渠道实现的?利用美国纵向商业数据库(U.S. Longitudinal Business Database) 1983年至2013年所有非农业私营企业的数据,我们得出了三个主要结论:首先,大部分增长似乎来自现有企业。我们从进入市场的公司(定义为成立不到5年的公司)的适度就业份额中推断出这一点。第二,大多数增长似乎是通过对现有品种的改进而不是创造全新的品种来实现的。第三,现有企业自身产品的改进似乎比创造性破坏更重要。我们之所以这样推断,是因为创造和破坏就业的分布比创造性破坏占主导地位的模型所暗示的要薄。