A comparative study of DFIG-based wind energy conversion systems with Fuzzy-PID and Fuzzy-logic controllers

Welcome Khulekani Ntuli, Gulshan Sharma, M. Kabeya
{"title":"A comparative study of DFIG-based wind energy conversion systems with Fuzzy-PID and Fuzzy-logic controllers","authors":"Welcome Khulekani Ntuli, Gulshan Sharma, M. Kabeya","doi":"10.1109/PowerAfrica53997.2022.9905240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores and compares the dynamic performance of two wind energy conversion systems (WECS): (1) the doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) based WECS incorporating voltage source converter (VSC) with a fuzzy-logic controller; (2) the DFIG based WECS incorporating VSC with a fuzzy-proportional integral derivative (PID) controller. This is done to reduce steady-state error while also reducing overshoot and undershoot oscillations and settling time of the voltage/current or power out signals and dc-link voltage. The grid-side converter is used to adjust the dc-link voltage and reactive power to their respective reference values. In addition, the rotor side converter regulates the DFIG’s rotor speed in order to maintain active power output. The vector control approach is applied to obtain adequate system control. MATLAB/SIMULINK is used to simulate the control system. The simulation findings indicated that the DFIG-based WECS with a fuzzy-PID controller outperformed more effectively than the DFIG-based WECS with fuzzy logic controller.","PeriodicalId":371237,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PowerAfrica53997.2022.9905240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores and compares the dynamic performance of two wind energy conversion systems (WECS): (1) the doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) based WECS incorporating voltage source converter (VSC) with a fuzzy-logic controller; (2) the DFIG based WECS incorporating VSC with a fuzzy-proportional integral derivative (PID) controller. This is done to reduce steady-state error while also reducing overshoot and undershoot oscillations and settling time of the voltage/current or power out signals and dc-link voltage. The grid-side converter is used to adjust the dc-link voltage and reactive power to their respective reference values. In addition, the rotor side converter regulates the DFIG’s rotor speed in order to maintain active power output. The vector control approach is applied to obtain adequate system control. MATLAB/SIMULINK is used to simulate the control system. The simulation findings indicated that the DFIG-based WECS with a fuzzy-PID controller outperformed more effectively than the DFIG-based WECS with fuzzy logic controller.
基于dfig的模糊pid和模糊逻辑风能转换系统的比较研究
本文对两种风能转换系统(WECS)的动态性能进行了探讨和比较:(1)基于双馈感应发电机(DFIG)的风能转换系统(WECS)结合了电压源变换器(VSC)和模糊逻辑控制器;(2)采用模糊比例积分微分(PID)控制器的基于DFIG的VSC的wcs。这样做是为了减少稳态误差,同时也减少了电压/电流或断电信号和直流链路电压的超调和欠调振荡和稳定时间。电网侧变流器用于将直流电压和无功功率调整到各自的参考值。此外,转子侧变换器调节DFIG的转子转速,以保持有功功率输出。采用矢量控制方法获得充分的系统控制。利用MATLAB/SIMULINK对控制系统进行仿真。仿真结果表明,采用模糊pid控制的基于dfig的自动控制系统比采用模糊逻辑控制的基于dfig的自动控制系统性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书