Forging a Language of Lies: Truth, Falsehood and Making in Early Modern England

Simen K. Nielsen
{"title":"Forging a Language of Lies: Truth, Falsehood and Making in Early Modern England","authors":"Simen K. Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/00233609.2021.1918761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The English language contains a plethora of words denoting and connoting material production – designations of Man as maker: Making, creating, fashioning, forging, fabricating, producing, generating, manufacturing, and so on. This catalogue of relative synonyms has, however, radical historical and internal differences of valence and meaning and surrounds the Early Modern nomenclature of “making” with unstable and ambiguous significations. As a phenomenon too frequently taken for granted in narratives of material and visual culture, “making” makes up a nexus of multiple and polysemous tensions in Early Modern language and thought. I intend in this paper to engage with the construction of “making” as a category embedded within theological discourses of “real” and “fake”, “truth” and “falsehood”, in the Calvinist environment of Early Modern England. Using the Reformation disputes on religious imagery and representation, and how these make use of the Old Testament imagery of Creation as a case in question – personified in discourse by figures such as William Perkins and John Jewel which will be at centre of this paper – I will especially seek to elucidate how the religious visual topography became a space for contention and negotiation, of anxieties related to fact and fiction, truth and falsehood.","PeriodicalId":164200,"journal":{"name":"Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00233609.2021.1918761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The English language contains a plethora of words denoting and connoting material production – designations of Man as maker: Making, creating, fashioning, forging, fabricating, producing, generating, manufacturing, and so on. This catalogue of relative synonyms has, however, radical historical and internal differences of valence and meaning and surrounds the Early Modern nomenclature of “making” with unstable and ambiguous significations. As a phenomenon too frequently taken for granted in narratives of material and visual culture, “making” makes up a nexus of multiple and polysemous tensions in Early Modern language and thought. I intend in this paper to engage with the construction of “making” as a category embedded within theological discourses of “real” and “fake”, “truth” and “falsehood”, in the Calvinist environment of Early Modern England. Using the Reformation disputes on religious imagery and representation, and how these make use of the Old Testament imagery of Creation as a case in question – personified in discourse by figures such as William Perkins and John Jewel which will be at centre of this paper – I will especially seek to elucidate how the religious visual topography became a space for contention and negotiation, of anxieties related to fact and fiction, truth and falsehood.
伪造谎言的语言:近代早期英国的真、假与制造
英语中有大量表示和暗示物质生产的词汇,即人类作为制造者的称号:Making、creating、fashioning、forging、fabricing、productive、generating、manufacturing等等。然而,这一相对同义词目录在价值和意义上存在着根本性的历史和内部差异,并使早期现代的“制造”命名法具有不稳定和模糊的意义。作为物质文化和视觉文化叙事中经常被视为理所当然的一种现象,“制造”在早期现代语言和思想中构成了多重和多义张力的纽带。在本文中,我打算在近代早期英国加尔文主义的环境中,将“制造”作为嵌入“真”与“假”、“真”与“假”神学话语中的一个范畴进行构建。利用宗教改革中关于宗教意象和表现的争论,以及这些争议如何利用旧约中创造的意象作为一个有问题的案例——在威廉·珀金斯和约翰·朱厄尔等人物的话语中被人格化,这将是本文的中心——我将特别寻求解释宗教视觉地形如何成为争论和协商的空间,以及与事实和虚构、真理和谬误有关的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信