Land Resource in Tanzania: Whose State, Whose Resource?

Evaristo Haulle
{"title":"Land Resource in Tanzania: Whose State, Whose Resource?","authors":"Evaristo Haulle","doi":"10.11114/IJSSS.V3I6.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper assesses land resource in Tanzania in relation to ownership, access and control for livelihood and development. The ownership of state and resources impacts the community stability and development. The paper employs political ecology approach to analyze the state of art in relation to land. In-depth interviews, Focus Group Discussions and Literature review were employed to establish historical trend in relation to conflicts and contradictions that exist in resource management. The paper advances that, since 1895, Tanzania has undergone a number of land reforms. Since then, principles of land tenure have not changed. This resulted to conflicts over land which occurs in different forms and scale. After independence, land was dispossessed in the name of national/or public interest to establish National Parks, agricultural projects and other projects that did not respond to internal demands. After the failure of the projects such land was not returned to the users. Moreover, Tanzania has formulated a number of laws to facilitate accumulation. These include commodification of land that raised its demand hence second scramble. About 16 Acts were enacted annually since 1990 to fulfil the demand that caused the rise of the question whose state. Both Tanzania and Mozambique inherited colonial systems of natural resource management and ownership which continue to inform the current practice. The state apparatuses are the agents of accumulation. The situation will be tense in future if not addressed now.","PeriodicalId":107127,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ecology eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ecology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/IJSSS.V3I6.1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper assesses land resource in Tanzania in relation to ownership, access and control for livelihood and development. The ownership of state and resources impacts the community stability and development. The paper employs political ecology approach to analyze the state of art in relation to land. In-depth interviews, Focus Group Discussions and Literature review were employed to establish historical trend in relation to conflicts and contradictions that exist in resource management. The paper advances that, since 1895, Tanzania has undergone a number of land reforms. Since then, principles of land tenure have not changed. This resulted to conflicts over land which occurs in different forms and scale. After independence, land was dispossessed in the name of national/or public interest to establish National Parks, agricultural projects and other projects that did not respond to internal demands. After the failure of the projects such land was not returned to the users. Moreover, Tanzania has formulated a number of laws to facilitate accumulation. These include commodification of land that raised its demand hence second scramble. About 16 Acts were enacted annually since 1990 to fulfil the demand that caused the rise of the question whose state. Both Tanzania and Mozambique inherited colonial systems of natural resource management and ownership which continue to inform the current practice. The state apparatuses are the agents of accumulation. The situation will be tense in future if not addressed now.
坦桑尼亚的土地资源:谁的国家,谁的资源?
本文评估了坦桑尼亚与生计和发展的所有权、获取和控制有关的土地资源。国家和资源的所有权关系到社会的稳定和发展。本文运用政治生态学的方法来分析土地的现状。采用深度访谈法、焦点小组讨论法和文献回顾法,建立资源管理中存在的冲突和矛盾的历史趋势。论文指出,自1895年以来,坦桑尼亚经历了一系列土地改革。从那以后,土地所有权的原则没有改变。这导致了不同形式和规模的土地冲突。独立后,土地以国家或公共利益的名义被剥夺,以建立国家公园、农业项目和其他不符合内部需求的项目。项目失败后,这些土地没有归还给用户。此外,坦桑尼亚还制定了一些有利于积累的法律。其中包括土地商品化,这提高了对土地的需求,从而引发了第二次争夺。自1990年以来,每年大约颁布16项法案,以满足引起国家问题的需求。坦桑尼亚和莫桑比克都继承了自然资源管理和所有权的殖民制度,这些制度继续影响着目前的做法。国家机器是积累的媒介。如果现在不加以解决,将来局势会变得紧张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信