Digital Protectionism: Myth or Reality?

O. Markova, A. Meleshkina
{"title":"Digital Protectionism: Myth or Reality?","authors":"O. Markova, A. Meleshkina","doi":"10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-2-26-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many governments continue or even return to protectionism, with a special influence on digital protectionism that has emerged in the era of digital development. Compared to the traditional protectionism the digital one usually differs due to the expansive growth of digital companies and the enormous amounts of data they gather. The authors focus on the two main elements of digital protectionism – a regulatory regime that creates barriers to cross-border data transfer and benefits in antitrust legislation in respect of internal companies. The purpose of the article is to identify the risks of applying special regulation of personal data protection and using antitrust policy to regulate digital companies functioning as means of protectionism. The analysis includes two stages: comparing of personal data protection and digital protectionism aims, assessing the protectionism motives within the framework of antitrust regulation. Based on the results of the study the authors come to the conclusion that industrial and antitrust regulators should take into account the risks of implementing digital protectionism to the competition.","PeriodicalId":290417,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-2-26-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many governments continue or even return to protectionism, with a special influence on digital protectionism that has emerged in the era of digital development. Compared to the traditional protectionism the digital one usually differs due to the expansive growth of digital companies and the enormous amounts of data they gather. The authors focus on the two main elements of digital protectionism – a regulatory regime that creates barriers to cross-border data transfer and benefits in antitrust legislation in respect of internal companies. The purpose of the article is to identify the risks of applying special regulation of personal data protection and using antitrust policy to regulate digital companies functioning as means of protectionism. The analysis includes two stages: comparing of personal data protection and digital protectionism aims, assessing the protectionism motives within the framework of antitrust regulation. Based on the results of the study the authors come to the conclusion that industrial and antitrust regulators should take into account the risks of implementing digital protectionism to the competition.
数字保护主义:神话还是现实?
许多政府继续甚至回归保护主义,对数字发展时代出现的数字保护主义产生了特殊的影响。与传统的保护主义相比,数字保护主义通常是不同的,因为数字公司的迅速增长和他们收集的大量数据。作者集中讨论了数字保护主义的两个主要因素——一种为跨境数据传输设置障碍的监管制度,以及对内部公司有利的反托拉斯立法。本文的目的是确定对个人数据保护实施特殊监管的风险,并利用反垄断政策来监管作为保护主义手段的数字公司。分析包括两个阶段:比较个人数据保护和数字保护的目标,评估反垄断监管框架内的保护主义动机。基于研究结果,作者得出结论,工业和反垄断监管机构应考虑实施数字保护主义对竞争的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信