Independence of Judiciary Leading Justice System to Injudicious Outline

A. Usman, M. Hassan, A. Q. Sial
{"title":"Independence of Judiciary Leading Justice System to Injudicious Outline","authors":"A. Usman, M. Hassan, A. Q. Sial","doi":"10.52279/ljss.04.02.233246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Independence of judiciary is a topic of protracted debate commonly involving essentials and merits of independence added by its constituents and due execution etc. First, the word independence has been adorned only with judicial organ although the meaning of this feature as a characteristic is essential ingredient of all institutions and their constituent sectors. Importance of the word independence has been applied in a distinguish sense to mean that judiciary as an organ maintained in self-contained composition, competence, and capabilities for administer of justice in the country. Being Independent of external interference or fairly performing judicial function is a privilege and a duty. Judiciary must obtain, secure, defend and continue with its independence by virtue of establishing rule of law in the country. Judiciary shall not only administer justice, but that also must ensure continuity of its organizational capacity at all costs. Meaning thereby its professional responsibilities must continue judiciously by overpowering any obstruction from any other person or organ. That is why Judiciary has been declared guardian of the constitution as well. This study must examine to what extent independence of judiciary has been exercised in Pakistan in the context of its actual meanings and requirements. Doctrine of independence of judiciary outstandingly elaborates that judiciary is to be equipped of self-sustaining condition and can never shift the burden of failure to external factors. When a judicial system under the constitution is given independence or it claims so, responsibility of its execution and maintenance is retained on its articulatio humeri. The study will conclude that in case of failure judiciary shall have to acknowledge responsibility all alone.","PeriodicalId":292498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law & Social Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law & Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52279/ljss.04.02.233246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Independence of judiciary is a topic of protracted debate commonly involving essentials and merits of independence added by its constituents and due execution etc. First, the word independence has been adorned only with judicial organ although the meaning of this feature as a characteristic is essential ingredient of all institutions and their constituent sectors. Importance of the word independence has been applied in a distinguish sense to mean that judiciary as an organ maintained in self-contained composition, competence, and capabilities for administer of justice in the country. Being Independent of external interference or fairly performing judicial function is a privilege and a duty. Judiciary must obtain, secure, defend and continue with its independence by virtue of establishing rule of law in the country. Judiciary shall not only administer justice, but that also must ensure continuity of its organizational capacity at all costs. Meaning thereby its professional responsibilities must continue judiciously by overpowering any obstruction from any other person or organ. That is why Judiciary has been declared guardian of the constitution as well. This study must examine to what extent independence of judiciary has been exercised in Pakistan in the context of its actual meanings and requirements. Doctrine of independence of judiciary outstandingly elaborates that judiciary is to be equipped of self-sustaining condition and can never shift the burden of failure to external factors. When a judicial system under the constitution is given independence or it claims so, responsibility of its execution and maintenance is retained on its articulatio humeri. The study will conclude that in case of failure judiciary shall have to acknowledge responsibility all alone.
司法独立导致司法体系走向不明智的轮廓
司法独立是一个长期争论的话题,通常涉及到组成部分独立的本质和优点以及司法独立的适当执行等问题。首先,独立一词只被冠以司法机关,尽管这一特征作为一种特征的含义是所有机构及其组成部门的基本组成部分。“独立”一词的重要性已在一种不同的意义上加以应用,以表示司法机构作为一个在国内维持独立组成、权限和能力的机构。不受外界干涉或公正地履行司法职能是一种特权和义务。司法必须通过在国家建立法治来获得、保障、捍卫和继续其独立性。司法机构不仅应执行司法,而且还必须不惜一切代价确保其组织能力的连续性。这意味着它的职业责任必须继续明智地压倒任何其他个人或机构的阻碍。这就是为什么司法部门也被宣布为宪法的守护者。这项研究必须在司法独立的实际意义和要求的范围内审查巴基斯坦在多大程度上行使了司法独立。司法独立主义突出地阐述了司法要具备自我维持的条件,不能将失败的负担转嫁给外部因素。当宪法规定的一个司法系统被赋予独立性或其声称具有独立性时,其执行和维护的责任根据其幽默条款予以保留。这项研究将得出结论,在失败的情况下,司法部门必须单独承认责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信