The Association of Constraints, Negotiation, and Social Influences with Recreation Specialization among Recreational Baseball Participants

Jaehyun Kim, Michael D. Ferguson, Benjamin Hickerson, A. Mowen
{"title":"The Association of Constraints, Negotiation, and Social Influences with Recreation Specialization among Recreational Baseball Participants","authors":"Jaehyun Kim, Michael D. Ferguson, Benjamin Hickerson, A. Mowen","doi":"10.18666/JPRA-2019-8794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recreation specialization is a progressive process that describes how recreationists engage in and view an activity over time (Scott & Shafer, 2001). This progression may be influenced by a variety of psychosocial factors behind an individual’s choice to engage in an activity. There have been calls for further studies that identify the antecedents which predict the specialization process (Scott & Shafer, 2001). To date, constraints, negotiation efforts and social influences have been examined separately across a variety of leisure and recreation contexts. However, less is known about the collective contribution of these factors in relation to recreation specialization, particularly with regard to social influences. The social relationships that recreationists build during their recreation careers may be an important predictor of recreation specialization. This study addresses this issue and examines the relationship between constraints, negotiation efforts, positive and negative social influences, and recreation specialization among a sample of recreational baseball participants. The sample consisted of 299 adult recreational baseball players in three cities across Korea. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted using AMOS 22.0, and analysis indicated that negotiation efforts were the strongest predictor of recreation specialization. The more baseball players identified strategies to overcome constraints, the more specialized they were in their activity. We also revealed that negative social influences had direct negative effects on recreation specialization, whereas positive social influences were indirectly associated with recreation specialization through constraints and/or negotiation efforts. Both positive and negative social influences directly triggered baseball participants’ negotiation efforts. That is, increases in positive and negative social influences encouraged participants to use strategies to negotiate the constraints they encountered. Constraints had a negative effect on negotiation efforts, suggesting that perceptions of constraints inhibited people from engaging in efforts to negotiate constraints. On a practical level, results suggest that baseball clubs and program organizers who wish to promote increase specialization could provide club members with a variety of opportunities for minimizing negative social influences. Within each baseball team, role allocation among team members and regular team gatherings may help enhance group bonding and team cohesion and avoid conflicts between team members. Additionally, recreational baseball organizations should consider strategies to reduce the cost of equipment and clothing associated with the sport. To increase sport facility and field availability, we suggested allowing local recreational baseball clubs to use school grounds during non-school hours. Finally, local parks, recreation agencies, and participants should work together for more effective facility scheduling. Subscribe to JPRA","PeriodicalId":223577,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Park and Recreation Administration","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Park and Recreation Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2019-8794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Recreation specialization is a progressive process that describes how recreationists engage in and view an activity over time (Scott & Shafer, 2001). This progression may be influenced by a variety of psychosocial factors behind an individual’s choice to engage in an activity. There have been calls for further studies that identify the antecedents which predict the specialization process (Scott & Shafer, 2001). To date, constraints, negotiation efforts and social influences have been examined separately across a variety of leisure and recreation contexts. However, less is known about the collective contribution of these factors in relation to recreation specialization, particularly with regard to social influences. The social relationships that recreationists build during their recreation careers may be an important predictor of recreation specialization. This study addresses this issue and examines the relationship between constraints, negotiation efforts, positive and negative social influences, and recreation specialization among a sample of recreational baseball participants. The sample consisted of 299 adult recreational baseball players in three cities across Korea. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted using AMOS 22.0, and analysis indicated that negotiation efforts were the strongest predictor of recreation specialization. The more baseball players identified strategies to overcome constraints, the more specialized they were in their activity. We also revealed that negative social influences had direct negative effects on recreation specialization, whereas positive social influences were indirectly associated with recreation specialization through constraints and/or negotiation efforts. Both positive and negative social influences directly triggered baseball participants’ negotiation efforts. That is, increases in positive and negative social influences encouraged participants to use strategies to negotiate the constraints they encountered. Constraints had a negative effect on negotiation efforts, suggesting that perceptions of constraints inhibited people from engaging in efforts to negotiate constraints. On a practical level, results suggest that baseball clubs and program organizers who wish to promote increase specialization could provide club members with a variety of opportunities for minimizing negative social influences. Within each baseball team, role allocation among team members and regular team gatherings may help enhance group bonding and team cohesion and avoid conflicts between team members. Additionally, recreational baseball organizations should consider strategies to reduce the cost of equipment and clothing associated with the sport. To increase sport facility and field availability, we suggested allowing local recreational baseball clubs to use school grounds during non-school hours. Finally, local parks, recreation agencies, and participants should work together for more effective facility scheduling. Subscribe to JPRA
休闲棒球参与者之约束、协商与社会影响与娱乐专业化之关联
娱乐专业化是一个渐进的过程,它描述了随着时间的推移,娱乐人士如何参与和看待一项活动(Scott & Shafer, 2001)。这种进展可能受到个人选择参与某项活动背后的各种心理社会因素的影响。有人呼吁进行进一步的研究,以确定预测专业化过程的前因(Scott & Shafer, 2001)。迄今为止,约束、谈判努力和社会影响已经在各种休闲和娱乐环境中分别进行了研究。然而,人们对这些因素在娱乐专业化方面的共同贡献知之甚少,特别是在社会影响方面。游憩者在其游憩生涯中建立的社会关系可能是游憩专业化的重要预测指标。本研究以休闲棒球参与者为样本,探讨约束条件、谈判努力、正面与负面社会影响与娱乐专门化之间的关系。调查对象是全国3个城市的299名成年棒球运动员。利用AMOS 22.0进行结构方程建模(SEM),结果表明谈判努力是休闲娱乐专业化的最强预测因子。棒球运动员确定的克服限制的策略越多,他们的活动就越专业。我们还发现,消极的社会影响对娱乐专业化有直接的负面影响,而积极的社会影响通过约束和/或谈判努力间接地与娱乐专业化相关。正面和负面的社会影响都直接影响棒球参与者的谈判努力。也就是说,积极和消极社会影响的增加鼓励参与者使用策略来协商他们遇到的限制。约束对谈判努力有负面影响,这表明对约束的感知抑制了人们参与谈判约束的努力。在实践层面上,结果表明,希望促进专业化的棒球俱乐部和项目组织者可以为俱乐部成员提供各种机会,以尽量减少负面的社会影响。在每个棒球队中,团队成员之间的角色分配和定期的团队聚会可以帮助增强团队联系和团队凝聚力,避免团队成员之间的冲突。此外,休闲棒球组织应该考虑降低与这项运动相关的设备和服装成本的策略。为了增加运动设施和场地的可用性,我们建议允许当地的休闲棒球俱乐部在非上课时间使用学校场地。最后,当地公园、娱乐机构和参与者应该共同努力,制定更有效的设施安排。订阅JPRA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信