D. Lilleker, I. Coman, M. Gregor, E. Novelli
{"title":"Political communication and COVID-19","authors":"D. Lilleker, I. Coman, M. Gregor, E. Novelli","doi":"10.4324/9781003120254-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This concluding chapter draws together data from the case study chapters to gain an understanding of the role of political communication during the pandemic and the way strategies were instituted within nations. We find across the phases of the crisis a range of differing strategies but four common themes. Firstly, crises exacerbate the trend towards personalisation. Secondly, the crucial role of the mass media in informing the public, but also the fact that tensions between the political and media spheres remain prevalent. Thirdly, we suggest that social media plays a largely positive role, despite being described as causing an infodemic, it was used far more to bring communities together. Finally, where misinformation prevailed, and tensions over measures became prominent, this was due to severe systemic polarisation existing which prevented messages of unity and calls to rally around the flag being adhered to. Hence political crises and instability create the conditions for the effects of a pandemic to be felt worse;given the parlous state of many of the world’s populations, these factors are likely to exacerbate this or future crises. © 2021 selection and editorial matter, Darren Lilleker, Ioana A. Coman, Miloš Gregor and Edoardo Novelli.","PeriodicalId":297542,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication and COVID-19","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Communication and COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120254-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
政治沟通与COVID-19
最后一章汇集了案例研究章节的数据,以了解大流行期间政治传播的作用以及各国制定战略的方式。在危机的各个阶段,我们发现了一系列不同的策略,但有四个共同的主题。首先,危机加剧了个性化的趋势。第二,大众传播媒介在向公众提供信息方面的关键作用,以及政治和传播媒介领域之间的紧张关系仍然普遍存在的事实。第三,我们认为社交媒体在很大程度上起着积极的作用,尽管它被描述为导致信息流行,但它更多地用于将社区聚集在一起。最后,在错误信息盛行的地方,有关措施的紧张局势变得突出,这是由于存在严重的系统性两极分化,这阻碍了团结的信息和团结在旗帜周围的呼吁得到遵守。因此,政治危机和不稳定为大流行病的影响变得更糟创造了条件;鉴于世界上许多人口的危险状况,这些因素很可能加剧当前或未来的危机。©2021选择和编辑事项,Darren Lilleker, Ioana A. Coman, milosi Gregor和Edoardo Novelli。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。