A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL PILOT STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRESS MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS ON JOB STRESS AND COPING STRATEGIES AMONG THE STAFF NURSES WORKING IN CRITICAL CARE UNITS OF SELECTED HOSPITAL AT DINDIGUL IN TAMILNADU

D. Thulasimani Thulasimani, R. Kumari
{"title":"A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL PILOT STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRESS MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS ON JOB STRESS AND COPING STRATEGIES AMONG THE STAFF NURSES WORKING IN CRITICAL CARE UNITS OF SELECTED HOSPITAL AT DINDIGUL IN TAMILNADU","authors":"D. Thulasimani Thulasimani, R. Kumari","doi":"10.47211/idcij.2021.v08i01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress is defined as any event, whether internal or environmental, that exceeds the adaptive or \nresistance resources of individual or social systems. It is a process that involves organic and psychic changes with \nrelevance to the cognitive system and how it interprets different stimuli In dealing with stressful situations, coping \nstrategies are employed in order for adverse events to be experienced more appropriately Methods: The study used \na quasi- experimental with one group pretest and posttest control group design. A total of 30 staff nurses were \nincluded as interventional group (n=15) and control group (n=15) through purposive sampling technique. Stress \nmanagement intervention was given for 1 week and review for another 3 weeks. On the first week of data \ncollection, following the pre- assessment, a detailed lecture was given on stress and coping strategies for seven \nconsecutive days to the interventional group. Followed by this, first post test assessment was done on the seventh \nday to both the groups and reviewed for another 3 consecutive weeks and second posttest assessment was also \ndone flowingly to both the group Data collection tools are(1) demographicvariables,(2) Expanded nurses stress \nscale (3) Ways of Coping scale (4) Stress management intervention programme Result: The overall mean difference \nbetween experimental group posttest-3 (79.33±18.73) and control group posttest -2 (163.53±10.15) group with \nmean difference was 84.2. The obtained ‘t’ value was 15.35 with p=0.001 which was statistically highly significant \ndifference between groups. The overall mean difference between experimental group posttest-3 (129.9±37.24) and \ncontrol group posttest -3 (55.07±6.91) groups with mean difference was 74.87. The obtained ‘t’ value was 7.65 \nwith p=0.001 which was statistically Highly significant difference between groups The result shows that the \nobtained coefficient correlation value in the control ‘r’ =-0.233 and p=0.048 which was statistically","PeriodicalId":417882,"journal":{"name":"IDC International Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDC International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47211/idcij.2021.v08i01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress is defined as any event, whether internal or environmental, that exceeds the adaptive or resistance resources of individual or social systems. It is a process that involves organic and psychic changes with relevance to the cognitive system and how it interprets different stimuli In dealing with stressful situations, coping strategies are employed in order for adverse events to be experienced more appropriately Methods: The study used a quasi- experimental with one group pretest and posttest control group design. A total of 30 staff nurses were included as interventional group (n=15) and control group (n=15) through purposive sampling technique. Stress management intervention was given for 1 week and review for another 3 weeks. On the first week of data collection, following the pre- assessment, a detailed lecture was given on stress and coping strategies for seven consecutive days to the interventional group. Followed by this, first post test assessment was done on the seventh day to both the groups and reviewed for another 3 consecutive weeks and second posttest assessment was also done flowingly to both the group Data collection tools are(1) demographicvariables,(2) Expanded nurses stress scale (3) Ways of Coping scale (4) Stress management intervention programme Result: The overall mean difference between experimental group posttest-3 (79.33±18.73) and control group posttest -2 (163.53±10.15) group with mean difference was 84.2. The obtained ‘t’ value was 15.35 with p=0.001 which was statistically highly significant difference between groups. The overall mean difference between experimental group posttest-3 (129.9±37.24) and control group posttest -3 (55.07±6.91) groups with mean difference was 74.87. The obtained ‘t’ value was 7.65 with p=0.001 which was statistically Highly significant difference between groups The result shows that the obtained coefficient correlation value in the control ‘r’ =-0.233 and p=0.048 which was statistically
一项准实验性试点研究,旨在评估压力管理干预措施对泰米尔纳德邦dindigul医院重症监护病房工作人员护士工作压力和应对策略的有效性
压力被定义为任何事件,无论是内部的还是环境的,超出了个人或社会系统的适应或抵抗资源。这是一个涉及到与认知系统及其如何解释不同刺激相关的有机和心理变化的过程,在处理压力情境时,采用应对策略以使不良事件更适当地经历。方法:采用准实验设计,一组前测和后测对照组设计。采用目的抽样方法,选取30名护理人员作为介入组(n=15)和对照组(n=15)。压力管理干预1周,复查3周。在数据收集的第一周,在预评估之后,对干预组进行了为期七天的关于压力和应对策略的详细讲座。随后,在第7天对两组进行第一次测试后评估,并连续3周进行复核,并对两组进行第二次测试后评估。数据收集工具为(1)人口统计学变量,(2)护士压力扩展量表,(3)应对方式量表,(4)压力管理干预方案。试验组后测-3(79.33±18.73)与对照组后测-2(163.53±10.15)组总平均差值为84.2。所得t值为15.35,p=0.001,组间差异有显著统计学意义。试验组后测3组(129.9±37.24)与对照组后测3组(55.07±6.91)的总平均差值为74.87。得到的t值为7.65,p=0.001,组间差异有统计学意义。结果表明,对照组得到的系数相关值r =-0.233, p=0.048,组间差异有统计学意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信