Manal Khursheed, F. Khan, Z. Hashmi, H. Khan, A. Sultan
{"title":"A study on the prevalence of needle stick injuries among health-care workers of a tertiary care hospital in Aligarh","authors":"Manal Khursheed, F. Khan, Z. Hashmi, H. Khan, A. Sultan","doi":"10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_14_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Globally, the reporting on the incidents of needle stick injuries (NSI) is far below the actual, and in hospitals which depend on their normal reporting systems, this figure may be up to ten times lower. NSIs can serve as a source of life-threatening infections; therefore, an insight into various factors that lead to it, along with the knowledge regarding prophylactic measures is important. Aim: The study aimed to develop an understanding of the causes and probability of NSI and knowledge of prophylactic measures among health-care workers (HCWs). Settings and Design: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted. Subjects and Methods: A structured questionnaire was developed for the study. Statistical Analysis Used: IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), v22.0 was used. Results: A total of 255 HCW were recruited, which consisted of 129 doctors, 110 nurses, and 16 laboratory assistants. The results of the study found that 36.1% of the HCW suffered from NSI. Of the total reported needlestick injuries, the maximum was among the doctors and in the age group of 22–30 years. Only 35.9% had reported the incident. Injuries were mostly sustained to the fingers occurred during use in the morning shift. Majority of the HCW were aware of HBV transmissibility and were vaccinated against it. Although a substantial number (162) of HCW were aware to take post-exposure prophylaxis against HBV and HIV within 72 h, only 12% took prophylactic treatment against HIV. Conclusions: NSI prevention strategies should be strictly implemented at the workplace and followed during procedures.","PeriodicalId":310565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_14_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Globally, the reporting on the incidents of needle stick injuries (NSI) is far below the actual, and in hospitals which depend on their normal reporting systems, this figure may be up to ten times lower. NSIs can serve as a source of life-threatening infections; therefore, an insight into various factors that lead to it, along with the knowledge regarding prophylactic measures is important. Aim: The study aimed to develop an understanding of the causes and probability of NSI and knowledge of prophylactic measures among health-care workers (HCWs). Settings and Design: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted. Subjects and Methods: A structured questionnaire was developed for the study. Statistical Analysis Used: IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), v22.0 was used. Results: A total of 255 HCW were recruited, which consisted of 129 doctors, 110 nurses, and 16 laboratory assistants. The results of the study found that 36.1% of the HCW suffered from NSI. Of the total reported needlestick injuries, the maximum was among the doctors and in the age group of 22–30 years. Only 35.9% had reported the incident. Injuries were mostly sustained to the fingers occurred during use in the morning shift. Majority of the HCW were aware of HBV transmissibility and were vaccinated against it. Although a substantial number (162) of HCW were aware to take post-exposure prophylaxis against HBV and HIV within 72 h, only 12% took prophylactic treatment against HIV. Conclusions: NSI prevention strategies should be strictly implemented at the workplace and followed during procedures.
背景:在全球范围内,针扎伤(NSI)事件的报告远低于实际情况,在依赖其正常报告系统的医院,这一数字可能要低10倍。nsi可成为威胁生命的感染源;因此,深入了解导致它的各种因素以及有关预防措施的知识是很重要的。目的:本研究旨在了解卫生保健工作者(HCWs)发生自伤的原因和概率,以及预防措施的知识。环境和设计:进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究。研究对象和方法:本研究采用结构化问卷。使用的统计分析:使用IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), v22.0。结果:共招募HCW 255人,其中医生129人,护士110人,实验室助理16人。研究结果发现,36.1%的HCW患有自伤。在报告的针刺伤害总数中,医生和22-30岁年龄组的人数最多。只有35.9%的人报告了这一事件。在早班使用时,手指受伤最多。大多数HCW知道HBV的传染性并接种了疫苗。尽管相当多的HCW(162)知道在暴露后72小时内采取预防HBV和HIV的措施,但只有12%的人采取了预防HIV的治疗。结论:在工作场所和手术过程中应严格执行防自伤策略。