자본시장통합법상 금융투자자보호제도의 문제점과 예금보험제도의 개선방안 (Problems in Respect to Investor Protection in the Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act and Possible Reformative Measures to the Deposit Insurance System)

Soo-seok Maeng
{"title":"자본시장통합법상 금융투자자보호제도의 문제점과 예금보험제도의 개선방안 (Problems in Respect to Investor Protection in the Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act and Possible Reformative Measures to the Deposit Insurance System)","authors":"Soo-seok Maeng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3018344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Korean Abstract:</b> 2009년 2월부터 시행될 자본시장통합법은 기능별 규제체제 및 금융상품의 포괄주의의 채택, 금융투자업자의 업무범위 확대, 금융투자업자의 의무 강화를 통한 투자자보호제도의 선진화 등의 내용을 담고 있다. 특히 자본시장통합법은 일반투자자 및 전문투자자 개념, 적합성원칙, 설명의무위반시 손해액의 추정에 관한 규정을 새로이 도입하는 등 기존의 자본관련 법제에 비해 투자자보호의 측면에서 비교적 선진화된 법제로 평가받고 있다. 그런데 이 법률은 투자자보호의 측면에서 투자권유단계에 초점을 맞추고 있을 뿐, 금융투자업자가 파산한 경우 등에 있어서 사후적으로 투자자를 보호하는데 한계를 내포하고 있다. 이러한 문제의식에서 이 연구에서는 자본시장통합법이 투자고객인 일반투자자를 어떻게 보호하고 있는가를 살펴보면서, 금융투자업자의 파산 등 사후적인 측면에 있어서 효율적인 투자자 보호방안을 검토하였다. ⑴ 자본시장통합법상 투자자보호제도를 개관하였다. ⑵ 각국의 경우 사후적으로 금융상품투자자를 어떻게 보호하고 있는지를 비교하였다. ⑶ 투자자의 사후적인 보호범위 및 보호대상의 문제, 투자보호한도 및 투자자보호기금체계의 문제 등에 관한 내용을 검토하였다. ⑷도덕적 위험을 막기 위한 금융투자회사의 내부통제시스템 강화 방안 등에 대하여 고찰하고, 현행법제의 개선방안을 제시하였다.<br><br><b>English Abstract:</b> The Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act(the “CMFIBA”), expected to come into effect from February 2009, sets forth the adoption of a functional regulation system and the concept of comprehensiveness with respect to financial products, the expansion of the role of financial investors, and improvements in the investor protection system through strengthening the duties of such investors. This legislation attempts to introduce the concept of general investors, the principle of suitability, and regulations as to the quantification of damages when in breach of the duty to inform, and is thus considered advanced legislation in terms of investor protection compared to the existing laws and regulations regarding the capital market. However, the CMFIBA only concentrates on the stage of soliciting investors and does not provide for the event of insolvency of investors which can be considered as limitation in the provision of necessary protection. Accordingly the CMFIBA may well be regarded unsatisfactor in light of investor protection measures in case of an investors’ insolvency. This paper looks into how the CMFIBA protects general investors and the clients of financial investors in the event of insolvency of financial investors and examines effective protection measures. This paper (1) reviews the investor protection system in the CMFIBA; (2) compares investor protection with that provided in other countries via depositor protection laws and so on; (3) examines the extent of such protection against the risks of loss of the principal and the suitability of the person to be protected, and the suitability of limits on the investment protection in regard to the post-management system against the insolvency of investors and the establishment of the investor protection funds system and (4) reviews the possible protective measures via regulationsover investors and investment banking firms and strengthened internal control systems in order to prevent moral risks and offers reformative measures to the existing laws.","PeriodicalId":166226,"journal":{"name":"Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Korean Abstract: 2009년 2월부터 시행될 자본시장통합법은 기능별 규제체제 및 금융상품의 포괄주의의 채택, 금융투자업자의 업무범위 확대, 금융투자업자의 의무 강화를 통한 투자자보호제도의 선진화 등의 내용을 담고 있다. 특히 자본시장통합법은 일반투자자 및 전문투자자 개념, 적합성원칙, 설명의무위반시 손해액의 추정에 관한 규정을 새로이 도입하는 등 기존의 자본관련 법제에 비해 투자자보호의 측면에서 비교적 선진화된 법제로 평가받고 있다. 그런데 이 법률은 투자자보호의 측면에서 투자권유단계에 초점을 맞추고 있을 뿐, 금융투자업자가 파산한 경우 등에 있어서 사후적으로 투자자를 보호하는데 한계를 내포하고 있다. 이러한 문제의식에서 이 연구에서는 자본시장통합법이 투자고객인 일반투자자를 어떻게 보호하고 있는가를 살펴보면서, 금융투자업자의 파산 등 사후적인 측면에 있어서 효율적인 투자자 보호방안을 검토하였다. ⑴ 자본시장통합법상 투자자보호제도를 개관하였다. ⑵ 각국의 경우 사후적으로 금융상품투자자를 어떻게 보호하고 있는지를 비교하였다. ⑶ 투자자의 사후적인 보호범위 및 보호대상의 문제, 투자보호한도 및 투자자보호기금체계의 문제 등에 관한 내용을 검토하였다. ⑷도덕적 위험을 막기 위한 금융투자회사의 내부통제시스템 강화 방안 등에 대하여 고찰하고, 현행법제의 개선방안을 제시하였다.

English Abstract: The Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act(the “CMFIBA”), expected to come into effect from February 2009, sets forth the adoption of a functional regulation system and the concept of comprehensiveness with respect to financial products, the expansion of the role of financial investors, and improvements in the investor protection system through strengthening the duties of such investors. This legislation attempts to introduce the concept of general investors, the principle of suitability, and regulations as to the quantification of damages when in breach of the duty to inform, and is thus considered advanced legislation in terms of investor protection compared to the existing laws and regulations regarding the capital market. However, the CMFIBA only concentrates on the stage of soliciting investors and does not provide for the event of insolvency of investors which can be considered as limitation in the provision of necessary protection. Accordingly the CMFIBA may well be regarded unsatisfactor in light of investor protection measures in case of an investors’ insolvency. This paper looks into how the CMFIBA protects general investors and the clients of financial investors in the event of insolvency of financial investors and examines effective protection measures. This paper (1) reviews the investor protection system in the CMFIBA; (2) compares investor protection with that provided in other countries via depositor protection laws and so on; (3) examines the extent of such protection against the risks of loss of the principal and the suitability of the person to be protected, and the suitability of limits on the investment protection in regard to the post-management system against the insolvency of investors and the establishment of the investor protection funds system and (4) reviews the possible protective measures via regulationsover investors and investment banking firms and strengthened internal control systems in order to prevent moral risks and offers reformative measures to the existing laws.
《资本市场整合法》中金融投资者保护制度的问题和存款保险制度的改善方案(Problems in Respect to Investor Protection in the Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act and Possible Reformative Measures to the Deposit Insurance)system)
Korean Abstract:从2009年2月开始实行的资本市场统合法的内容包括采纳各功能的规制体制及金融商品的包括主义、扩大金融投资商的业务范围、强化金融投资商的义务等投资者保护制度的先进化等。特别是,《资本市场统合法》新引进了一般投资者及专门投资者的概念、适合性原则、违反说明义务时的损失额推测相关规定等,与现有的资本相关法制相比,在投资者保护方面被评价为比较先进的法制。但是,该法律只是从保护投资者的角度出发,将焦点放在劝诱投资阶段,在金融投资商破产等情况下,在事后保护投资者方面存在一定的局限性。在这种问题意识下,该研究观察了《资本市场统合法》如何保护作为投资顾客的普通投资者,并在金融投资商破产等事后方面研究了有效的投资者保护方案。(1)《资本市场统合法》规定投资者保护制度。(2)比较各国事后如何保护金融商品投资者。(3)探讨投资者事后保护范围及保护对象问题,投资保护限度及投资者保护基金体系问题等。(4)考察了金融投资公司为防止道德风险而加强内部控制系统的方案,并提出了现行法律的改善方案。english abstract:《资本市场与金融投资商业法案》(CMFIBA), expected to come into effect from February 2009;the adoption of a functional regulation system and the concept of comprehensiveness with respect to financial products, the expansion of the role of financial investorsand improvements in the investor protection system through strengthening the duties of such investors。This legislation attempts to introduce the concept of general investors, the principle of suitability, and regulations as to the quantification of damages when in breach of the duty to inform;and is thus considered advanced legislation in terms of investor protection compared to the existing laws and regulations regarding the capital market。however,CMFIBA only concentrates on the stage of soliciting investors and does not provide for the event of insolvency of investors which can be considered as limitation in the provision of necessaryprotection。Accordingly the CMFIBA may well be regarded unsatisfactor in light of investor protection measures in case of an investors ' insolvency。This paper looks into how the CMFIBA protects general investors and the clients of financial investors in the event of insolvency of financial investors and examines effective protection measuresThis paper (1) reviews the investor protection system in the CMFIBA;(2) compares investor protection with that provided in other countries via depositor protection laws and so on;examines the extent of such protection against the risks of loss of the principal and the suitability of the person to be protected;regard to the post-management system against the insolvency of investors and the establishment of investor protection funds system and the suitability of limits4 . reviews the possible protective measures via regulationsover investors and investment banking firms and strengthened internal control systems in order to prevent moral risks and offersreformative measures to the existing laws。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信