The evolution of the South African science, technology and innovation system 1994–2009: An exploration

H. C. Marais, M. Pienaar
{"title":"The evolution of the South African science, technology and innovation system 1994–2009: An exploration","authors":"H. C. Marais, M. Pienaar","doi":"10.1109/ACSIP.2009.5367851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is part of a longitudinal project on the evolution of the South African science, technology and innovation (STI) system since 1994, the year that marked the end of apartheid government. It was hypothesised that the overarching national (and international) commitment of the post-1994 government to reform society to become an inclusive system serving the needs of all changes would impact on four of the main pillars of the STI system, viz. national objectives, funding of the system, the human resource composition (specifically race) and steering/control mechanisms. The research approach consisted of qualitative analyses of published information reflecting the positions and initiatives of the government department entrusted with the oversight function of STI (Department of S&T). The analyses showed, firstly, that the core STI missions were changed substantially over time. Secondly, the funding of the system relative to GDP in effect stalled while new policies were put in place, but started rising moderately since 2001. Thirdly, extensive transformation has been brought about on the human resource dimension in terms of race equity, especially at management and executive level. Thirdly, the South African government has over the past decade introduced a range of new steering mechanisms and significantly tightened its control on public research institutions. The paper concludes by identifying four perspectives on the future of the STI system, viz. firstly STI for development of the disadvantaged components of society, secondly insistence on implementation time frames and M&E schedules for new initiatives, thirdly the government's commitment to grow the STI budget might be restrained, and fourthly increasing government control over publicly financed STI. In conclusion it was noted that the specific contents of these perspectives would be determined by the future direction of the country.","PeriodicalId":280544,"journal":{"name":"2009 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSIP.2009.5367851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper is part of a longitudinal project on the evolution of the South African science, technology and innovation (STI) system since 1994, the year that marked the end of apartheid government. It was hypothesised that the overarching national (and international) commitment of the post-1994 government to reform society to become an inclusive system serving the needs of all changes would impact on four of the main pillars of the STI system, viz. national objectives, funding of the system, the human resource composition (specifically race) and steering/control mechanisms. The research approach consisted of qualitative analyses of published information reflecting the positions and initiatives of the government department entrusted with the oversight function of STI (Department of S&T). The analyses showed, firstly, that the core STI missions were changed substantially over time. Secondly, the funding of the system relative to GDP in effect stalled while new policies were put in place, but started rising moderately since 2001. Thirdly, extensive transformation has been brought about on the human resource dimension in terms of race equity, especially at management and executive level. Thirdly, the South African government has over the past decade introduced a range of new steering mechanisms and significantly tightened its control on public research institutions. The paper concludes by identifying four perspectives on the future of the STI system, viz. firstly STI for development of the disadvantaged components of society, secondly insistence on implementation time frames and M&E schedules for new initiatives, thirdly the government's commitment to grow the STI budget might be restrained, and fourthly increasing government control over publicly financed STI. In conclusion it was noted that the specific contents of these perspectives would be determined by the future direction of the country.
1994-2009年南非科技创新体系的演变:一个探索
这篇论文是一个关于南非科学、技术和创新(STI)体系自1994年以来演变的纵向项目的一部分。1994年标志着种族隔离政府的结束。据推测,1994年后政府对社会改革的总体国家(和国际)承诺将成为一个服务于所有变化需求的包容性系统,这将影响科技创新系统的四个主要支柱,即国家目标、系统资金、人力资源构成(特别是种族)和指导/控制机制。研究方法包括对反映具有科技创新监督职能的政府部门的立场和举措的公开信息进行定性分析。分析表明,首先,核心科技创新任务随着时间的推移发生了重大变化。其次,在新政策实施期间,该体系的资金相对于GDP的比例实际上停滞不前,但自2001年以来开始温和上升。第三,在种族平等方面,在人力资源方面进行了广泛的改革,特别是在管理和执行层面。第三,南非政府在过去十年中引入了一系列新的指导机制,并大大加强了对公共研究机构的控制。最后,本文确定了科技创新系统未来的四种观点,即:第一,科技创新促进社会弱势群体的发展;第二,坚持新举措的实施时间框架和M&E时间表;第三,政府增加科技创新预算的承诺可能受到限制;第四,加强政府对公共资助的科技创新的控制。最后,有人指出,这些展望的具体内容将由该国未来的方向决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信