Stethoscope hygiene and barriers among physicians – A cross-sectional study from National Guard Health Affairs in Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Suha Al Saleh, Aidah Al Rammah, W. Syed, Rawan Al Duhailan, Sufanah Kattan, Fawiziah Al-Mana
{"title":"Stethoscope hygiene and barriers among physicians – A cross-sectional study from National Guard Health Affairs in Dammam, Saudi Arabia","authors":"Suha Al Saleh, Aidah Al Rammah, W. Syed, Rawan Al Duhailan, Sufanah Kattan, Fawiziah Al-Mana","doi":"10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_19_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the stethoscope hygiene Disinfection practice and barriers among National Guard Health Affairs physicians in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A paper-based cross sectional prospective study was conducted among physicians practicing at the Imam Abdurrahman Al-Faisal Hospital over a period of 3 months from October to December 2018. We assessed the frequency and method of disinfection, perception of contamination, and barriers to disinfection. Results: Ninety-three respondents completed the survey. The results of the study found that Isopropyl alcohol 70% or an alcohol swab was the most common disinfecting agent, reported by 77 (82.8%) of respondents. The majority of the respondents 33 (35.5%) were spend 5-10 seconds to disinfect the stethoscope, 24 (25.8%) were <5 seconds, 12 (12.9%) were never disinfect stethoscope. Half of the respondents 51 (54%) were disinfect stethoscope after every use, 10 (10.8%) were disinfect multiples times per week, while 6 (6.5%) were disinfect stethoscope. The most common reported barriers to cleaning stethoscopes were forgetfulness/laziness 42 (45.2%), lack of time 30 (32.3%), or lack of knowledge regarding the best disinfectant 21 (22.6%). Conclusion: This study found that the vast majority of respondents reported cleaning of stethoscope using a suitable method of their choice. Increasing physicians' access to appropriate disinfectants and providing visual reminders in health care facilities may improve stethoscope disinfection practices.","PeriodicalId":310565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_19_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the stethoscope hygiene Disinfection practice and barriers among National Guard Health Affairs physicians in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A paper-based cross sectional prospective study was conducted among physicians practicing at the Imam Abdurrahman Al-Faisal Hospital over a period of 3 months from October to December 2018. We assessed the frequency and method of disinfection, perception of contamination, and barriers to disinfection. Results: Ninety-three respondents completed the survey. The results of the study found that Isopropyl alcohol 70% or an alcohol swab was the most common disinfecting agent, reported by 77 (82.8%) of respondents. The majority of the respondents 33 (35.5%) were spend 5-10 seconds to disinfect the stethoscope, 24 (25.8%) were <5 seconds, 12 (12.9%) were never disinfect stethoscope. Half of the respondents 51 (54%) were disinfect stethoscope after every use, 10 (10.8%) were disinfect multiples times per week, while 6 (6.5%) were disinfect stethoscope. The most common reported barriers to cleaning stethoscopes were forgetfulness/laziness 42 (45.2%), lack of time 30 (32.3%), or lack of knowledge regarding the best disinfectant 21 (22.6%). Conclusion: This study found that the vast majority of respondents reported cleaning of stethoscope using a suitable method of their choice. Increasing physicians' access to appropriate disinfectants and providing visual reminders in health care facilities may improve stethoscope disinfection practices.
听诊器卫生和医生之间的障碍-来自沙特阿拉伯达曼国民警卫队卫生事务的横断面研究
目的:本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯达曼市国民警卫队卫生事务医生听诊器卫生消毒实践和障碍。方法:对2018年10月至12月在伊玛目·阿卜杜拉赫曼·费萨尔医院执业的医生进行了一项基于纸张的横断面前瞻性研究。我们评估了消毒的频率和方法、污染的感知和消毒的障碍。结果:93名受访者完成了调查。研究结果发现,77%(82.8%)的受访者报告说,70%的异丙醇或酒精棉签是最常见的消毒剂。调查对象中消毒听诊器时间为5 ~ 10秒的有33例(35.5%),小于5秒的有24例(25.8%),从未消毒听诊器的有12例(12.9%)。51例(54%)听诊器每次使用后消毒,10例(10.8%)听诊器每周多次消毒,6例(6.5%)听诊器消毒。据报道,最常见的清洁听诊器障碍是健忘/懒惰(45.2%),缺乏时间(32.3%),或缺乏关于最佳消毒剂的知识(22.6%)。结论:本研究发现绝大多数受访者报告使用自己选择的合适方法清洁听诊器。增加医生获得适当消毒剂的机会,并在卫生保健设施中提供视觉提醒,可能会改善听诊器消毒实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信