Cartographies of Belonging: Reflections on Indigeneity and Autochthony

Deanna Cachoian-Schanz
{"title":"Cartographies of Belonging: Reflections on Indigeneity and Autochthony","authors":"Deanna Cachoian-Schanz","doi":"10.1163/26670038-12342796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis creative nonfiction reflects upon the political utility of the terms “indigeneity” and “autochthony” to describe human (and non-human) groups as genealogically bound to or originally springing from singular geographies. What do these terms reinscribe, and what might attachments to them foreclose to the Armenian, and more broadly, to the collective human experience? This mix of text and image is a plea to move beyond an “autochthonous” logic that naturalizes the coupling of bodies to lands to account, instead, for a more just and capacious understanding of existence as by, through, and for the in/animate “other” across multiple geographies and timescapes.","PeriodicalId":388620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26670038-12342796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This creative nonfiction reflects upon the political utility of the terms “indigeneity” and “autochthony” to describe human (and non-human) groups as genealogically bound to or originally springing from singular geographies. What do these terms reinscribe, and what might attachments to them foreclose to the Armenian, and more broadly, to the collective human experience? This mix of text and image is a plea to move beyond an “autochthonous” logic that naturalizes the coupling of bodies to lands to account, instead, for a more just and capacious understanding of existence as by, through, and for the in/animate “other” across multiple geographies and timescapes.
归属的地图学:对本土性和本土性的思考
这部创造性的非虚构作品反映了“土著”和“本土民族”这两个术语的政治效用,这些术语用来描述人类(和非人类)群体在谱系上与单一地理区域联系在一起,或者最初起源于单一地理区域。这些术语重新定义了什么,对它们的依恋可能剥夺了亚美尼亚人,更广泛地说,剥夺了人类集体经验的什么?这种文本和图像的混合是对超越“本土”逻辑的请求,这种逻辑将身体与土地的耦合自然化,相反,对于存在的更公正和更广泛的理解是通过,通过,以及跨越多个地理和时间的在/动画“他者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信