Constitution Plagiarism: The Gambian Reality

Akpojevbe Omasanjuwa
{"title":"Constitution Plagiarism: The Gambian Reality","authors":"Akpojevbe Omasanjuwa","doi":"10.31126/akrajournal.1061643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Note addresses the assignment mandated The Gambia Constitution Drafting Committee to prepare a Constitution to replace that of 1997 in response to popular demand. The team of experts assembled by government accomplished the task though with a serious flaw: plagiarism. The legislature however, for other reasons, vetoed the document. With diverse viewpoints on plagiarism and legal maxims, through qualitative analysis, this Note examines where the fault lay by probing what the assignment entails. The action of the drafting Committee left the society confused and without recourse after spending a whooping sum of money on what turned out to be a white elephant project that preserved rather than eliminate well preserved colonial constitutional anachronisms. As no legal remedy exist for both plagiarism and breach of trust, the Note concluded that the fault is not in their stars but in the society that needs to accelerate the pace of educational development to avert a repeat of the incidence.","PeriodicalId":269437,"journal":{"name":"AKRA KÜLTÜR SANAT VE EDEBİYAT DERGİSİ","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AKRA KÜLTÜR SANAT VE EDEBİYAT DERGİSİ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31126/akrajournal.1061643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Note addresses the assignment mandated The Gambia Constitution Drafting Committee to prepare a Constitution to replace that of 1997 in response to popular demand. The team of experts assembled by government accomplished the task though with a serious flaw: plagiarism. The legislature however, for other reasons, vetoed the document. With diverse viewpoints on plagiarism and legal maxims, through qualitative analysis, this Note examines where the fault lay by probing what the assignment entails. The action of the drafting Committee left the society confused and without recourse after spending a whooping sum of money on what turned out to be a white elephant project that preserved rather than eliminate well preserved colonial constitutional anachronisms. As no legal remedy exist for both plagiarism and breach of trust, the Note concluded that the fault is not in their stars but in the society that needs to accelerate the pace of educational development to avert a repeat of the incidence.
宪法剽窃:冈比亚的现实
该说明说明了冈比亚宪法起草委员会的任务,即根据民众的要求编写一部宪法以取代1997年的宪法。由政府组建的专家小组完成了这项任务,但却有一个严重的缺陷:抄袭。然而,由于其他原因,立法机关否决了该文件。通过对抄袭和法律准则的不同观点,通过定性分析,本文通过探究作业所需要的内容来检查错误所在。起草委员会的行动使社会感到困惑,而且没有追索权,因为它花费了一大笔钱,结果却成了一个累赘的项目,保留了而不是消除了保存完好的殖民地宪法时代错误。由于抄袭和失信行为都没有法律救济,《说明》得出的结论是,问题不在于他们的明星,而在于社会需要加快教育发展的步伐,以避免此类事件的重演。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信