How Repetitive are Karate Kicks Performed by Skilled Practitioners?

T. Hachaj, M. Piekarczyk, M. Ogiela
{"title":"How Repetitive are Karate Kicks Performed by Skilled Practitioners?","authors":"T. Hachaj, M. Piekarczyk, M. Ogiela","doi":"10.1145/3192975.3192989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to propose the DTW-based signal comparison method that allows comparing motion capture (MoCap) measurements obtained from athletes even with different body proportions. We have applied the proposed framework to evaluate how repetitive are popular karate kicks performed by skilled athletes. The repetition level is defined with DTW distances and alignments of preprocessed MoCap data of a single activity performed by the same person. This knowledge is an important step to prepare tabularized norms which can be used as very useful tool by sport society to improve the training with the aid of modern computer methods. With those norms we can tell which DTW distances are typical for highly skilled karateka. The maximal distance between two aligned trajectories might differs from 9.36 ± 2.08 cm for to even 29.21 ± 16.5 cm. This last situation is caused by the fact that a person can perform the same kick with large nonlinear temporal displacements of actions phase, however, we have to remember, that those displacements happen in time periods of about 0.05 seconds in length. The results we obtained are very important because they show what range values one should expect from this kind of comparison and might be a reference for other scientists.","PeriodicalId":128533,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3192975.3192989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose the DTW-based signal comparison method that allows comparing motion capture (MoCap) measurements obtained from athletes even with different body proportions. We have applied the proposed framework to evaluate how repetitive are popular karate kicks performed by skilled athletes. The repetition level is defined with DTW distances and alignments of preprocessed MoCap data of a single activity performed by the same person. This knowledge is an important step to prepare tabularized norms which can be used as very useful tool by sport society to improve the training with the aid of modern computer methods. With those norms we can tell which DTW distances are typical for highly skilled karateka. The maximal distance between two aligned trajectories might differs from 9.36 ± 2.08 cm for to even 29.21 ± 16.5 cm. This last situation is caused by the fact that a person can perform the same kick with large nonlinear temporal displacements of actions phase, however, we have to remember, that those displacements happen in time periods of about 0.05 seconds in length. The results we obtained are very important because they show what range values one should expect from this kind of comparison and might be a reference for other scientists.
熟练的空手道练习者的踢腿动作有多重复?
本文的目的是提出基于dtw的信号比较方法,该方法可以比较从不同身体比例的运动员获得的运动捕捉(MoCap)测量值。我们已经应用提出的框架,以评估如何重复是流行的空手道踢由熟练的运动员执行。重复水平由同一个人执行的单个活动的DTW距离和预处理动作捕捉数据的对齐来定义。这一认识是编制表格规范的重要一步,可以作为体育社会借助现代计算机方法改进训练的非常有用的工具。有了这些标准,我们就可以判断出高技能空手道运动员的典型DTW距离。两个对齐轨迹之间的最大距离可能从9.36±2.08 cm到29.21±16.5 cm不等。最后一种情况是由于一个人可以在动作阶段的大量非线性时间位移中执行相同的踢腿,然而,我们必须记住,这些位移发生在大约0.05秒的时间周期内。我们得到的结果非常重要,因为它们表明了人们应该从这种比较中得到的范围值,并且可能为其他科学家提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信