Reflections on didactical thinking in music education: Insights through the comparison of two german didactical concepts

Joana Grow, Andreas Lehmann-Wermser
{"title":"Reflections on didactical thinking in music education: Insights through the comparison of two german didactical concepts","authors":"Joana Grow, Andreas Lehmann-Wermser","doi":"10.26034/vd.jrea.2023.3587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term “Didaktik” is very typical for German music education scholars. Nevertheless, different meanings of the concept “Didaktik” can be found in music education research. It can mean the “analysis of lessons” and be based on theories from Educational Psychology or it also can mean “theory and praxis of teaching and learning”. Since teaching exists in other countries without referring to this construct, we ask, “Why is Didaktik helpful?” We will discuss this topic by looking at two of the most prominent concepts of “Didaktik” currently being advocated in the domain of music education in Germany. We will present two fictitious music lessons that follow these didactic concepts in an idealised form. One lesson is based on the concept of “Produktionsdidaktik” which aims at musical aesthetic experiences (Rolle 1999; Wallbaum 2009, 2000). The other lesson follows the concept called “Aufbauender Musikunterricht” (AMU), which focuses especially on verifiable competence development. Both lessons have the same topic. The differences between the two lessons in terms of musical approaches, methodology or the role of the teacher are discussed. They make the effects of didactical thinking visible.","PeriodicalId":240039,"journal":{"name":"Journal de recherche en éducations artistiques (JREA)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de recherche en éducations artistiques (JREA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26034/vd.jrea.2023.3587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term “Didaktik” is very typical for German music education scholars. Nevertheless, different meanings of the concept “Didaktik” can be found in music education research. It can mean the “analysis of lessons” and be based on theories from Educational Psychology or it also can mean “theory and praxis of teaching and learning”. Since teaching exists in other countries without referring to this construct, we ask, “Why is Didaktik helpful?” We will discuss this topic by looking at two of the most prominent concepts of “Didaktik” currently being advocated in the domain of music education in Germany. We will present two fictitious music lessons that follow these didactic concepts in an idealised form. One lesson is based on the concept of “Produktionsdidaktik” which aims at musical aesthetic experiences (Rolle 1999; Wallbaum 2009, 2000). The other lesson follows the concept called “Aufbauender Musikunterricht” (AMU), which focuses especially on verifiable competence development. Both lessons have the same topic. The differences between the two lessons in terms of musical approaches, methodology or the role of the teacher are discussed. They make the effects of didactical thinking visible.
音乐教育中教学思维的思考:德国两种教学理念比较的启示
“Didaktik”这个词对于德国音乐教育学者来说是非常典型的。然而,在音乐教育研究中,“Didaktik”概念的含义却不尽相同。它可以指“课程分析”,以教育心理学的理论为基础,也可以指“教与学的理论与实践”。由于其他国家的教学没有参考这个结构,我们问,“为什么Didaktik有帮助?”我们将通过看看目前在德国音乐教育领域提倡的两个最突出的“Didaktik”概念来讨论这个话题。我们将呈现两个虚构的音乐课,以理想化的形式遵循这些教学概念。一节课是基于“生产”的概念,旨在音乐审美体验(Rolle 1999;Wallbaum 2009, 2000)。另一个教训是遵循“学习能力”(Aufbauender musikunterright,简称AMU)的概念,它特别关注可验证的能力发展。两节课的主题是一样的。讨论了两个课程在音乐方法、方法论或教师角色方面的差异。它们使教学思维的效果可见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信