Standard of Care and Transparency in Clinical Trials Conducted in Developing Countries of Africa

Pia Mielczarek, Anna Streichhardt, Dnyanesh Limaye, Vaidehi Limaye, F. Fneish, G. Fortwengel
{"title":"Standard of Care and Transparency in Clinical Trials Conducted in Developing Countries of Africa","authors":"Pia Mielczarek, Anna Streichhardt, Dnyanesh Limaye, Vaidehi Limaye, F. Fneish, G. Fortwengel","doi":"10.11648/J.CAJPH.20190502.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical trials are conducted all over the world, including developing economies in Africa. Pharmaceutical companies could easily take advantage of the regulatory situation in these vulnerable countries. This research study examines ethical statements of the 25 top pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical trials in Africa regarding three questions in objectives according to their policies or their websites. Objectives: 1. Do pharmaceutical companies mention clinical trials in developing countries? 2. Do pharmaceutical companies mention the issue with standard of care? 3. Do pharmaceutical companies mention NDA (New Drug Application) and special prices for countries and participants? Methods: To evaluate the statements found in their policies or websites, a rating scale with a maximum of 10 points was developed. The statements of the pharmaceutical companies have been rated by at least two independent researchers. High points are equal to high standards, the maximum points were 10. Results: Only 15 out of the biggest 25 pharmaceutical companies were conducting at least 10 clinical trials in developing countries in Africa during the last five years. On average, the pharmaceutical companies achieved a score of 6.93 of 10. Conclusion: On one hand, the result shows that some companies achieved high scores. On the other hand, it shows that some companies need to improve their policies and statements of commitment to serve as a role model.","PeriodicalId":339086,"journal":{"name":"Central African Journal of Public Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central African Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.CAJPH.20190502.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials are conducted all over the world, including developing economies in Africa. Pharmaceutical companies could easily take advantage of the regulatory situation in these vulnerable countries. This research study examines ethical statements of the 25 top pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical trials in Africa regarding three questions in objectives according to their policies or their websites. Objectives: 1. Do pharmaceutical companies mention clinical trials in developing countries? 2. Do pharmaceutical companies mention the issue with standard of care? 3. Do pharmaceutical companies mention NDA (New Drug Application) and special prices for countries and participants? Methods: To evaluate the statements found in their policies or websites, a rating scale with a maximum of 10 points was developed. The statements of the pharmaceutical companies have been rated by at least two independent researchers. High points are equal to high standards, the maximum points were 10. Results: Only 15 out of the biggest 25 pharmaceutical companies were conducting at least 10 clinical trials in developing countries in Africa during the last five years. On average, the pharmaceutical companies achieved a score of 6.93 of 10. Conclusion: On one hand, the result shows that some companies achieved high scores. On the other hand, it shows that some companies need to improve their policies and statements of commitment to serve as a role model.
在非洲发展中国家进行的临床试验的护理标准和透明度
背景:临床试验在世界各地进行,包括非洲的发展中经济体。制药公司可以很容易地利用这些脆弱国家的监管状况。这项研究调查了25家顶级制药公司在非洲进行临床试验的伦理声明,根据他们的政策或他们的网站,关于三个问题的目标。目的:1。制药公司提到发展中国家的临床试验了吗?2. 制药公司有没有提到护理标准的问题?3.制药公司是否提到NDA(新药申请)和国家和参与者的特殊价格?方法:对其政策或网站上的陈述进行评价,制定了最高10分的评分量表。制药公司的声明已由至少两名独立研究人员进行了评级。高分等于高标准,满分为10分。结果:在过去五年中,最大的25家制药公司中只有15家在非洲发展中国家进行了至少10项临床试验。制药公司的平均得分为6.93分(满分为10分)。结论:一方面,结果表明一些公司获得了很高的分数。另一方面,它表明一些公司需要改进他们的政策和承诺声明,以作为榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信