Studia diplomatica. The Diplomacy of Apocalypsis

E. Medem
{"title":"Studia diplomatica. The Diplomacy of Apocalypsis","authors":"E. Medem","doi":"10.33920/vne-01-2301-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crisis status of the contemporary Western civilisation and the processes of its secular spiritual decay as the main reason for conflict state with the Russian world with its Christian Orthodox tradition. Inability for Russia to acknowledge the modern neoliberal order, enforced in Europe and initiated by an Anglo-Saxon non-Christian ideology. Its impact and of its secular values on general situation around European and global diplomacy, international law marginalisation as a legal nihilism as a result of it. Attempt to substitute traditional diplomatic notions and values in favour of liberal supremacy as the main reason for weakness and ineffectiveness of today’s diplomacy and nullity of international law. Given the historical part of Russian Europe in forming European and Europe-Asian identity, an obvious task is to save the historical Europe, to protect its Christian identity from Anglo-Saxon antihumane ideas and from cancel-culture policy in Europe. In this regard historical school of European diplomacy preserves its major role, which had been formed with the Russian foreign policy involvement during the last centuries. The very diplomatic factors must ensure the European cultural identity, the century traditions of unity and alliance between Russia and European countries. With Anglo-Saxon protectorate in Europe, US interests dominance, preserving Russian role in European expanse is crucial in Western European conscious, as well as impeding the decline of Russia’s activities in relations with European states and prevention of vacuum in such cooperation, despite the rise of interest towards East and Asia. It’s important not to allow a revision of geopolitical role of Russia on the Western direction due to costs of the turn to the East. Both in cultural and civilisational aspects Russia remains to be a European state, and a geopolitical view on cooperation with Asia must not lead to the destruction of Russian positions and infl uence in Europe. With the de-facto transformation of the EU into a military-political power, a NATO affix, it’s important to put eff orts into the rise of the level of bilateral relations and a partnership with the European countries, securing a reduction of the EU negative role, which doesn’t represent the whole Europe, with Russia being part of it.","PeriodicalId":339528,"journal":{"name":"Diplomaticheskaja sluzhba (Diplomatic Service)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diplomaticheskaja sluzhba (Diplomatic Service)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/vne-01-2301-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crisis status of the contemporary Western civilisation and the processes of its secular spiritual decay as the main reason for conflict state with the Russian world with its Christian Orthodox tradition. Inability for Russia to acknowledge the modern neoliberal order, enforced in Europe and initiated by an Anglo-Saxon non-Christian ideology. Its impact and of its secular values on general situation around European and global diplomacy, international law marginalisation as a legal nihilism as a result of it. Attempt to substitute traditional diplomatic notions and values in favour of liberal supremacy as the main reason for weakness and ineffectiveness of today’s diplomacy and nullity of international law. Given the historical part of Russian Europe in forming European and Europe-Asian identity, an obvious task is to save the historical Europe, to protect its Christian identity from Anglo-Saxon antihumane ideas and from cancel-culture policy in Europe. In this regard historical school of European diplomacy preserves its major role, which had been formed with the Russian foreign policy involvement during the last centuries. The very diplomatic factors must ensure the European cultural identity, the century traditions of unity and alliance between Russia and European countries. With Anglo-Saxon protectorate in Europe, US interests dominance, preserving Russian role in European expanse is crucial in Western European conscious, as well as impeding the decline of Russia’s activities in relations with European states and prevention of vacuum in such cooperation, despite the rise of interest towards East and Asia. It’s important not to allow a revision of geopolitical role of Russia on the Western direction due to costs of the turn to the East. Both in cultural and civilisational aspects Russia remains to be a European state, and a geopolitical view on cooperation with Asia must not lead to the destruction of Russian positions and infl uence in Europe. With the de-facto transformation of the EU into a military-political power, a NATO affix, it’s important to put eff orts into the rise of the level of bilateral relations and a partnership with the European countries, securing a reduction of the EU negative role, which doesn’t represent the whole Europe, with Russia being part of it.
皆diplomatica。《启示录》的外交
当代西方文明的危机状态及其世俗精神衰败的过程是国家与具有东正教传统的俄罗斯世界发生冲突的主要原因。俄罗斯无法承认现代新自由主义秩序,这种秩序在欧洲得到执行,由盎格鲁-撒克逊非基督教意识形态发起。它的影响和它的世俗价值观对欧洲和全球外交的总体形势,国际法边缘化作为法律虚无主义的结果。企图以自由至上主义取代传统外交观念和价值观,这是当今外交软弱和无效以及国际法无效的主要原因。鉴于俄罗斯欧洲在形成欧洲和欧亚认同方面的历史作用,一个显而易见的任务是拯救历史上的欧洲,保护其基督教认同免受盎格鲁-撒克逊人反人道思想和欧洲取消文化政策的影响。在这方面,欧洲外交的历史学派保留了其主要作用,这一作用是在过去几个世纪中俄罗斯外交政策参与下形成的。外交因素必须确保欧洲的文化认同,俄罗斯与欧洲国家之间的团结和联盟的百年传统。随着盎格鲁-撒克逊人在欧洲的保护国,美国的利益主导地位,保持俄罗斯在欧洲广阔地区的作用在西欧意识中至关重要,以及阻止俄罗斯在与欧洲国家关系中的活动下降,防止这种合作中的真空,尽管对东亚和亚洲的兴趣上升。重要的是,不要因为转向东方的代价而允许俄罗斯在西方方向上的地缘政治角色发生改变。在文化和文明方面,俄罗斯仍然是一个欧洲国家,与亚洲合作的地缘政治观点不应导致俄罗斯在欧洲的地位和影响的破坏。随着欧盟事实上转变为一个军事政治力量,一个北约的词根,重要的是要努力提高双边关系水平和与欧洲国家的伙伴关系,确保减少欧盟的负面作用,这并不代表整个欧洲,俄罗斯是其中的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信