DETERMINATION OF THE PRESCRIPTION OF DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES BY RADIOGRAPHY: A CASE FROM EXPERT PRACTICE

Юлия Ли, Marina Valentinovna Vishnyakova, V. Klevno
{"title":"DETERMINATION OF THE PRESCRIPTION OF DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES BY RADIOGRAPHY: A CASE FROM EXPERT PRACTICE","authors":"Юлия Ли, Marina Valentinovna Vishnyakova, V. Klevno","doi":"10.17816/fm711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT.Background:When conducting a forensic medical examination of victims, accused persons, etc., it is important to determine the prescription of fractures, which allows the expert to immediately determine the causal relationship of the skeletal injury found in the sub-expert with the events described in the decision on the appointment of a forensic medical examination, especially in cases when the examination is carried out according to medical documents, there is, for one reason or another, the possibility of a forensic medical examination of the sub-expert, when there is concealment or distortion of the circumstances of the incident, and the investigating authorities, nevertheless, need to make a decision on the case and establish the truth. Often, medical documents, especially in cases of a single request for medical help, do not contain enough information about the clinical picture of the fracture, the description of the local status is scarce or absent at all. In such cases, one of the most important sources of information for the expert is radiography data (radiographs in electronic form or on X-ray film, computed tomograms), the study of which allows the expert to draw conclusions about the mechanism of injury and the prescription of fractures.The study of literary sources on this topic did not reveal the exact criteria for determining the prescription of fractures based on the study of the results of X-ray examination methods in the forensic aspect.Description of the expert case. The description of a case from practice is given: in our practice, there was a case when the fractures found in the subexpert did not correspond to the events of the incident described in the resolution, these fractures were not regarded by the surgeon as \"old\" and unrelated to the specified circumstances of the case. The examination of the presented radiographs allowed the forensic medical expert to determine the time frame of the fractures detected and establish the absence of a causal relationship of this injury with the events specified in the resolution. Conclusion. The analysis of this expert case allows us to come to the conclusion about the importance of examining the radiography data by the forensic medical expert himself in the aspect of determining the prescription of fractures.","PeriodicalId":346404,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/fm711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT.Background:When conducting a forensic medical examination of victims, accused persons, etc., it is important to determine the prescription of fractures, which allows the expert to immediately determine the causal relationship of the skeletal injury found in the sub-expert with the events described in the decision on the appointment of a forensic medical examination, especially in cases when the examination is carried out according to medical documents, there is, for one reason or another, the possibility of a forensic medical examination of the sub-expert, when there is concealment or distortion of the circumstances of the incident, and the investigating authorities, nevertheless, need to make a decision on the case and establish the truth. Often, medical documents, especially in cases of a single request for medical help, do not contain enough information about the clinical picture of the fracture, the description of the local status is scarce or absent at all. In such cases, one of the most important sources of information for the expert is radiography data (radiographs in electronic form or on X-ray film, computed tomograms), the study of which allows the expert to draw conclusions about the mechanism of injury and the prescription of fractures.The study of literary sources on this topic did not reveal the exact criteria for determining the prescription of fractures based on the study of the results of X-ray examination methods in the forensic aspect.Description of the expert case. The description of a case from practice is given: in our practice, there was a case when the fractures found in the subexpert did not correspond to the events of the incident described in the resolution, these fractures were not regarded by the surgeon as "old" and unrelated to the specified circumstances of the case. The examination of the presented radiographs allowed the forensic medical expert to determine the time frame of the fractures detected and establish the absence of a causal relationship of this injury with the events specified in the resolution. Conclusion. The analysis of this expert case allows us to come to the conclusion about the importance of examining the radiography data by the forensic medical expert himself in the aspect of determining the prescription of fractures.
用x线摄影确定骨干骨折的处方:来自专家实践的一例
摘要背景:在对受害者、被告等进行法医检查时,重要的是确定骨折的处方,这使专家能够立即确定在副专家身上发现的骨骼损伤与关于指定法医检查的决定中所描述的事件之间的因果关系,特别是在根据医疗文件进行检查的情况下,由于这样或那样的原因,在隐瞒或歪曲事件情况的情况下,有可能对副专家进行法医检查,但调查当局需要对案件作出决定并确定真相。通常,医疗文件,特别是在单一的医疗帮助请求的情况下,不包含关于骨折的临床图像的足够信息,对局部状态的描述很少或根本没有。在这种情况下,专家最重要的信息来源之一是放射照相数据(电子形式的放射照相或x射线胶片,计算机断层摄影),对这些数据的研究使专家能够得出关于损伤机制和骨折处方的结论。关于这一课题的文献资料的研究并没有揭示在法医方面基于x线检查方法结果的研究来确定骨折处方的确切标准。专家案例的描述。给出了一个实践案例的描述:在我们的实践中,有一个病例,当在亚专家中发现的骨折与决议中描述的事件不对应时,这些骨折不被外科医生视为“旧的”,与病例的特定情况无关。对所提交的x光片的检查使法医专家能够确定所发现的骨折的时间范围,并确定这种损伤与决议中规定的事件没有因果关系。结论。通过对这一专家案例的分析,我们可以得出结论,即法医专家亲自检查x线片资料在确定骨折处方方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信