Freedom of Information Audits as Access Advocacy

Kevin Walby, Jeff Yaremko
{"title":"Freedom of Information Audits as Access Advocacy","authors":"Kevin Walby, Jeff Yaremko","doi":"10.32473/joci.v2i2.126523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the performance of FOI regimes, associations of journalists and other groups undertake FOI audits. These audits assess the depth of disclosure, the use of exemptions, among other indicators of the health of FOI laws. Drawing on a thematic analysis of FOI audits, we examine how these audits are conducted and what the audits reveal about FOI in multiple jurisdictions. We discern four themes in these audits: (1) law enforcement and security hindrance of FOI, (2) a link between FOI advocacy and struggles for government transparency, (3) gross abuses of FOI, and (4) the potential for social change. Arguing that FOI audits are a form of access advocacy, we suggest future FOI audits could be more community-based and participatory. We also provide recommendations for those undertaking future FOI audits.","PeriodicalId":165927,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Civic Information","volume":"25 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Civic Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/joci.v2i2.126523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of FOI regimes, associations of journalists and other groups undertake FOI audits. These audits assess the depth of disclosure, the use of exemptions, among other indicators of the health of FOI laws. Drawing on a thematic analysis of FOI audits, we examine how these audits are conducted and what the audits reveal about FOI in multiple jurisdictions. We discern four themes in these audits: (1) law enforcement and security hindrance of FOI, (2) a link between FOI advocacy and struggles for government transparency, (3) gross abuses of FOI, and (4) the potential for social change. Arguing that FOI audits are a form of access advocacy, we suggest future FOI audits could be more community-based and participatory. We also provide recommendations for those undertaking future FOI audits.
信息自由审计作为访问倡导
为了评估《信息自由法》制度的表现,记者协会和其他团体进行《信息自由法》审计。这些审计评估披露的深度、豁免的使用以及信息自由法健康状况的其他指标。通过对信息自由审计的专题分析,我们研究了这些审计是如何进行的,以及这些审计在多个司法管辖区揭示了信息自由的哪些方面。我们在这些审计中发现了四个主题:(1)信息自由的执法和安全障碍;(2)信息自由倡导与争取政府透明度之间的联系;(3)信息自由的严重滥用;(4)社会变革的潜力。我们认为信息自由审计是倡导获取信息的一种形式,建议未来的信息自由审计可以更加以社区为基础,更具参与性。我们还为未来进行信息自由审计的机构提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信