Formally verified redundancy removal

S. Hendricx, L. Claesen
{"title":"Formally verified redundancy removal","authors":"S. Hendricx, L. Claesen","doi":"10.1145/307418.307479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, logic redundancy tends to degrade design-quality by introducing additional delays in signal propagation, by increasing the gate count or simply by making the resulting hardware untestable. Since they cannot always be avoided, unwanted redundancies have to be first identified and then removed from our designs. In this paper an alternative methodology to identify and remove redundancy is proposed, which is based on a formal, symbolic verification strategy. The formal framework underlying our approach aids in identifying redundancies and allows us to guarantee the correctness of their removal.","PeriodicalId":442382,"journal":{"name":"Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, 1999. Proceedings (Cat. No. PR00078)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, 1999. Proceedings (Cat. No. PR00078)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/307418.307479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In general, logic redundancy tends to degrade design-quality by introducing additional delays in signal propagation, by increasing the gate count or simply by making the resulting hardware untestable. Since they cannot always be avoided, unwanted redundancies have to be first identified and then removed from our designs. In this paper an alternative methodology to identify and remove redundancy is proposed, which is based on a formal, symbolic verification strategy. The formal framework underlying our approach aids in identifying redundancies and allows us to guarantee the correctness of their removal.
正式验证的冗余删除
一般来说,逻辑冗余往往会通过在信号传播中引入额外的延迟,通过增加门数或仅仅通过使结果硬件不可测试来降低设计质量。因为它们不可能总是避免,所以必须首先识别不必要的冗余,然后从我们的设计中删除。本文提出了一种基于形式化、符号化验证策略的识别和去除冗余的替代方法。我们的方法的正式框架有助于识别冗余,并允许我们保证删除它们的正确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信