Power in International Tax Politics

Lukas Hakelberg
{"title":"Power in International Tax Politics","authors":"Lukas Hakelberg","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501748011.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter develops a theory of power in international tax politics. This theory identifies market size and regulatory capacity as the decisive resources enabling governments to issue credible threats and inducements with a view toward making other governments do what they would not otherwise do. A lack of regulatory capacity explains why the European Union has not wielded the same power in negotiations over global tax policy as the United States despite the EU's similarly sized internal market. In fact, taxation remains an exclusive member state competence. Therefore, the European Commission has no administrative authority to impose penalties on third states or foreign firms not complying with tax good governance standards applicable within the union. At the same time, the principle of nondiscrimination enshrined in EU law prevents individual EU countries from passing sanctions against other member states abetting tax evasion and avoidance. Because of the lack of regulatory centralization in the EU, the US can act as a hegemon in international tax politics. Accordingly, US preferences determined by domestic politics decisively shape the content of global tax policy. The preferences of other governments merely affect the US administration's enforcement strategy.","PeriodicalId":356523,"journal":{"name":"The Hypocritical Hegemon","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hypocritical Hegemon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501748011.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter develops a theory of power in international tax politics. This theory identifies market size and regulatory capacity as the decisive resources enabling governments to issue credible threats and inducements with a view toward making other governments do what they would not otherwise do. A lack of regulatory capacity explains why the European Union has not wielded the same power in negotiations over global tax policy as the United States despite the EU's similarly sized internal market. In fact, taxation remains an exclusive member state competence. Therefore, the European Commission has no administrative authority to impose penalties on third states or foreign firms not complying with tax good governance standards applicable within the union. At the same time, the principle of nondiscrimination enshrined in EU law prevents individual EU countries from passing sanctions against other member states abetting tax evasion and avoidance. Because of the lack of regulatory centralization in the EU, the US can act as a hegemon in international tax politics. Accordingly, US preferences determined by domestic politics decisively shape the content of global tax policy. The preferences of other governments merely affect the US administration's enforcement strategy.
国际税收政治中的权力
本章发展了国际税收政治中的权力理论。该理论认为,市场规模和监管能力是决定性的资源,使政府能够发出可信的威胁和诱惑,以迫使其他政府做他们本来不会做的事情。监管能力的缺乏解释了为什么欧盟在全球税收政策的谈判中没有像美国那样行使同样的权力,尽管欧盟的内部市场规模与美国相当。事实上,税收仍然是成员国独有的权限。因此,欧盟委员会没有行政权力对不遵守欧盟内部适用的税收善治标准的第三国或外国公司实施处罚。与此同时,欧盟法律规定的非歧视原则阻止了个别欧盟国家对教唆逃税和避税的其他成员国实施制裁。由于欧盟缺乏监管集中化,美国可以在国际税收政治中扮演霸主的角色。因此,由国内政治决定的美国偏好决定性地塑造了全球税收政策的内容。其他国家政府的偏好只会影响美国政府的执法策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信