At turde skabe momentum - kompetencebehov i et hybridt og internationalt bibliotekslandskab

Hans Elbeshausen, Kristian Delica
{"title":"At turde skabe momentum - kompetencebehov i et hybridt og internationalt bibliotekslandskab","authors":"Hans Elbeshausen, Kristian Delica","doi":"10.7146/NTIK.V7I3.111490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last 60 years, changes in librarianship have led to an increasing hybridization, and inspired a discussion on what a competence profile might look like for future library staff. Whether the structural changes were triggered by innovative processes, internationalization or by strengthening social and cultural capital, it resulted in altered self-image and fragmented forms of practice. We argue that shifting cultural policy regimes have intensified processes of hybridization and forced libraries to act as Gyro Gearlooses in a tirelessly search for new fields of activity, strategic alliances and more efficient working methods.Theoretically and methodically informed by neo-institutional theory and especially by historical institutionalism, we focus on the Janus-faced nature of change processes distinguishing 'preservation competences' from 'change competences' thus conceiving hybridization as a change with limitations or as constrained selection. After the analysis of cultural policy since the 1960s till the 1980s, we investigate hybridization based on a case study. Central to this are various models of international cooperation that reflect different experiences, competencies, and needs. The analysis shows that changes in the institutional framework are not necessarily the result of a deliberate strategy, but the random result of internal and external adaptations of libraries to their changing environments. In conclusion, we find that technical knowledge and the ability to maneuver in a project organization are not sufficient. This makes it even more important to develop an understanding of the permanently shifting power coalitions in organizational fields as a vehicle of institutional change processes.","PeriodicalId":246650,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/NTIK.V7I3.111490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the last 60 years, changes in librarianship have led to an increasing hybridization, and inspired a discussion on what a competence profile might look like for future library staff. Whether the structural changes were triggered by innovative processes, internationalization or by strengthening social and cultural capital, it resulted in altered self-image and fragmented forms of practice. We argue that shifting cultural policy regimes have intensified processes of hybridization and forced libraries to act as Gyro Gearlooses in a tirelessly search for new fields of activity, strategic alliances and more efficient working methods.Theoretically and methodically informed by neo-institutional theory and especially by historical institutionalism, we focus on the Janus-faced nature of change processes distinguishing 'preservation competences' from 'change competences' thus conceiving hybridization as a change with limitations or as constrained selection. After the analysis of cultural policy since the 1960s till the 1980s, we investigate hybridization based on a case study. Central to this are various models of international cooperation that reflect different experiences, competencies, and needs. The analysis shows that changes in the institutional framework are not necessarily the result of a deliberate strategy, but the random result of internal and external adaptations of libraries to their changing environments. In conclusion, we find that technical knowledge and the ability to maneuver in a project organization are not sufficient. This makes it even more important to develop an understanding of the permanently shifting power coalitions in organizational fields as a vehicle of institutional change processes.
在过去的60年里,图书馆事业的变化导致了越来越多的杂化,并激发了关于未来图书馆工作人员的能力概况的讨论。无论结构变化是由创新过程、国际化还是通过加强社会和文化资本引发的,它都导致了自我形象的改变和实践形式的碎片化。我们认为,不断变化的文化政策制度加剧了融合的过程,迫使图书馆像陀螺齿轮一样,不知疲倦地寻找新的活动领域、战略联盟和更有效的工作方法。在新制度理论,特别是历史制度主义的理论和方法指导下,我们将重点放在区分“保存能力”和“变化能力”的变化过程的双面性质上,从而将杂交视为具有局限性的变化或约束选择。在分析了20世纪60年代至80年代的文化政策之后,我们以个案研究的方式来考察杂交。这方面的核心是反映不同经验、能力和需求的各种国际合作模式。分析表明,制度框架的变化不一定是刻意策略的结果,而是图书馆内部和外部适应环境变化的随机结果。总之,我们发现在项目组织中,技术知识和操作能力是不够的。这使得对组织领域中作为制度变革过程载体的永久变化的权力联盟的理解变得更加重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信